1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0097-8493(99)00118-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate overlaying for mobile augmented reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a remote display we are looking at personal digital assistants (PDAs). Our goal is to develop or adapt tracking technology and user interface paradigms that will allow a remote medical advisor to use a PDA as a "magic lens" for looking at the remote scene [11]- [14].…”
Section: B Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a remote display we are looking at personal digital assistants (PDAs). Our goal is to develop or adapt tracking technology and user interface paradigms that will allow a remote medical advisor to use a PDA as a "magic lens" for looking at the remote scene [11]- [14].…”
Section: B Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the UbiCom program at Delft University a mobile augmented reality system is being developed [24,12] that will consist of a mobile receiver with an augmented reality display that will receive the rendering data over a mobile link from a base station. As the augmented reality is to operate in perfect alignment/registration with the real world, the latency requirements are extremely severe.…”
Section: Prototype Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the augmented reality is to operate in perfect alignment/registration with the real world, the latency requirements are extremely severe. Earlier, we presented an approach to enable low-latency rendering on a mobile platform [12]. With the limited CPU power and communication bandwidth available to the mobile unit, our prototype implementation can handle about 350 texture-mapped polygons with a maximum end-to-end latency of 8 ms.…”
Section: Prototype Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Configurations using optical AR however, are more latency sensitive than immersive VR configurations since real world objects have no latency and delays of virtual objects can be seen directly. For mobile AR tasks such as tourist information, remote maintenance and support, we estimate that 10 ms will be acceptable [6].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have measured a latency of 8.5 ms between the moment the tracker data comes in and the moment the picture part corresponding to that position has fully been displayed [6,22]. To be cleared and rendered …”
Section: Low Latency Renderingmentioning
confidence: 99%