2011
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2011.2134890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of RSS-Based Centroid Localization Algorithms in an Indoor Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike Section 6.1 to Section 6.3, we fix the target node location and vary the ranging error magnitude, so we can compare their performance from a different angle. Figures 8 and 9 depict the MSE versus ranging error with the target node located at (30,40) m and (80, 20) m, respectively. It is observed that when the ranging error is relatively small, the two-step estimator closely follows the CRLB and outperforms the other estimators.…”
Section: Estimation Accuracy Versus Ranging Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Section 6.1 to Section 6.3, we fix the target node location and vary the ranging error magnitude, so we can compare their performance from a different angle. Figures 8 and 9 depict the MSE versus ranging error with the target node located at (30,40) m and (80, 20) m, respectively. It is observed that when the ranging error is relatively small, the two-step estimator closely follows the CRLB and outperforms the other estimators.…”
Section: Estimation Accuracy Versus Ranging Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be stated that while the proposed algorithm improves the location accuracy, it requires high computational complexity due to the complex mathematical models used. In [14], the accuracy of indoor localization measurement based on a wireless sensor network is analysed using position estimation procedure. This procedure is based on the received-signal-strength measurements collected in a real indoor environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples in the literature are the use of the RSS of RF 2 Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing signals [10,11], a combination of RF and ultrasonic signals [12,13], and different data fusion schemes [14,15]. In Höflinger et al [16], the authors propose an acoustic-based system using high-pitch chirps and at least 3 known-location receivers to achieve a localization error of approximately 30 cm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%