2012
DOI: 10.4103/0972-124x.94609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a new computerized cemento-enamel junction probe

Abstract: Background and Objectives:The assessment of clinical attachment level (CAL) represents the gold standard for diagnosing and monitoring periodontal disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of the newly introduced cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) probe in detecting CAL, using CEJ as a fixed reference point, and to compare the CEJ probe with the Florida stent probe (FSP) as well as with a standard manual probe, University of North Carolina-15 (UNC-15).Materials and Methods:Three examiner… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Which was a periodontal probing system, could precise the electronic measurement to 0.1 mm, and automatically store oral clinical examination information. Electronic recording of the data can eliminate errors that occur when probe tip markings are read visually [27]. This is a significant improvement over conventional manual probes, those are commonly used in other periodontal disease surveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which was a periodontal probing system, could precise the electronic measurement to 0.1 mm, and automatically store oral clinical examination information. Electronic recording of the data can eliminate errors that occur when probe tip markings are read visually [27]. This is a significant improvement over conventional manual probes, those are commonly used in other periodontal disease surveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the interexaminer group- and site-wise comparison, ICC for manual probe was higher as compared to the Florida probe which was in accordance with reports by Wang et al .,[ 28 ] Jeffcoat and Reddy,[ 33 ] Reddy et al .,[ 34 ] and Oringer et al . [ 35 ] but in contrast to the studies of Gibbs et al .,[ 6 ] Deepa and Prakash,[ 10 ] and Jeffcoat et al . [ 36 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The width of this edge was small enough not to interfere with PD measurements offering clinicians, measurement of clinical attachment level (CAL) and PD concurrently. [ 10 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine periodontal clinical examination was performed by evaluating probing depth (PD) [ 16 ], bleeding on probing (BOP) [ 17 ], and clinical attachment level (CAL) [ 18 ]. All the clinical parameters were recorded only once regardless of the number of scaling sessions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%