1980
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Death Certification in an Autopsied Population With Specific Attention to Malignant Neoplasms and Vascular Diseases

Abstract: Accuracy of certification of underlying cause of death and implications for US mortality statistics were assessed among 257 autopsied cases collected during the calendar year 1970 at a short-stay general hospital in Atlanta, GA. Clinicopathologic cause of death (CPCD) certificates, with assignment of underlying cause of death based on autopsy findings in combination with pertinent clinical data, were prepared by a pathologist and were employed as a standard of comparison against which the accuracy of the under… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, it has been demonstrated that population-based studies that rely on cancer-specific mortality suffer from misclassification bias because of inaccuracies of the causes of death documented on death certificates. [29][30][31] In summary, our population-based study results support previous reports that mode and depth of invasion are critical prognostic factors among patients with tongue cancer. It is worth pointing out that patients who had unknown DI (presumably representing a combination of patients with poor and good survival) had a statistically significant 9-fold increase in mortality compared with patients whose DI was documented as 3 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Conversely, it has been demonstrated that population-based studies that rely on cancer-specific mortality suffer from misclassification bias because of inaccuracies of the causes of death documented on death certificates. [29][30][31] In summary, our population-based study results support previous reports that mode and depth of invasion are critical prognostic factors among patients with tongue cancer. It is worth pointing out that patients who had unknown DI (presumably representing a combination of patients with poor and good survival) had a statistically significant 9-fold increase in mortality compared with patients whose DI was documented as 3 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Literature has reported that the accuracy of coding varied with the cause of death, especially when the deceased had two conditions concurrently and both contributed to death. 30,31 Three approaches were used to minimize the potential misclassification in the study. First, a relatively wide range of categories of cause of death was chosen to avoid potential serious misclassification of cause-specific mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation of epidemiological research based on death certification data has been questioned by some [23], mainly in terms of the accuracy of the information. A recent autopsy study showed that the underlying cause of death, assigned by the pathologist, was mentioned on the death certificates in 72% of cases [24]. Multiple-cause analysis, where all conditions mentioned on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%