“…The correlation of results was analyzed by a decision-analysis approach to determine the utility or relative desirability of aspiration cytology. The following values concerning diagnostic accuracy were calculated in the present study and in 25 other reports from the literature [2][3][4][5][6]8,9,11,13,14,16,17,19,22,25,26,29,31,33,35,38,40,[43][44][45] : (1) sensitivity, the probability of a positive FNA result given that the patient has carcinoma; (2) specificity, the probability of a negative FNA result given that the patient has a benign lesion; (3) positive predictive value, the probability of having carcinoma when the results of FNA are positive; (4) negative predictive value, the probability that a tumor is benign when the results of FNA are negative; (5) FPF, the fraction of all benign lesions reported as positive by FNA; and (6) FNF, the fraction of all carcinomas reported as negative on FNA.…”