1999
DOI: 10.1159/000331150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of Fine Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value has varied tremendously in other studies, ranging from 0.7-47%. [12][13][14]17,21,31,32 The wide variation in the numbers of inadequate specimens in different series may depend on the criteria for calling a specimen inadequate. Adequacy guidelines with respect to the number of epithelial cells required have been published, with fewer than six epithelial cell clusters considered inadequate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value has varied tremendously in other studies, ranging from 0.7-47%. [12][13][14]17,21,31,32 The wide variation in the numbers of inadequate specimens in different series may depend on the criteria for calling a specimen inadequate. Adequacy guidelines with respect to the number of epithelial cells required have been published, with fewer than six epithelial cell clusters considered inadequate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported sensitivity and specificity of breast FNA ranges from 94% to 100% and 98% to 100%, respectively. [1][2][3] It is known that there are some benign proliferative breast lesions that can exhibit cytologic features similar to those of low-grade or sparsely cellular carcinomas. 4 Many authorities have recognized this limitation of breast cytopathology and have advocated the use of a categorical or probabilistic approach for reporting breast FNA to limit false positive and false negative di-agnoses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muhamed et al [26] 90.6 100 100 99 -Rubin et al [27] 87 100 100 89 -Ishikawa et al [28] 86.3 98.2 97.9 --Collaco et al [29] 92. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%