Different clones, protocol conditions, instruments, and scoring/readout methods may pose challenges in introducing different PD-L1 assays for immunotherapy. The diagnostic accuracy of using different PD-L1 assays interchangeably for various purposes is unknown. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to address PD-L1 assay interchangeability based on assay diagnostic accuracy for established clinical uses/purposes. A systematic search of the MEDLINE database using PubMed platform was conducted using “PD-L1” as a search term for 01/01/2015 to 31/08/2018, with limitations “English” and “human”. 2,515 abstracts were reviewed to select for original contributions only. 57 studies on comparison of two or more PD-L1 assays were fully reviewed. 22 publications were selected for meta-analysis. Additional data were requested from authors of 20/22 studies in order to enable the meta-analysis. Modified GRADE and QUADAS-2 criteria were used for grading published evidence and designing data abstraction templates for extraction by reviewers. PRISMA was used to guide reporting of systematic review and meta-analysis and STARD 2015 for reporting diagnostic accuracy study. CLSI EP12-A2 was used to guide test comparisons. Data were pooled using random-effects model. The main outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy of various PD-L1 assays. The 22 included studies provided 376 2×2 contingency tables for analyses. Results of our study suggest that, when the testing laboratory is not able to use an Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic(s) for PD-L1 assessment for its specific clinical purpose(s), it is better to develop a properly validated laboratory developed test for the same purpose(s) as the original PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved immunohistochemistry companion diagnostic, than to replace the original PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved immunohistochemistry companion diagnostic with a another PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic that was developed for a different purpose.

Seizures are reported to occur in at least 20% of patients with metastatic or primary brain tumour. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Brain tumour patients who present with seizures are treated with anticonvulsants but these drugs are frequently used prophylactically. A generalized seizure may be lethal if it is prolonged or if the patient does not recover consciousness. [18][19][20][21][22] Seizures may cause unacceptable toxicity or interact with other drugs, such as corticosteroids [23][24][25] or chemotherapeutic agents which may compromise the patient's overall treatment. Retrospective studies of prophylactic anticonvulsants in patients with metastases have been conflicting ABSTRACT: Objective: We conducted a clinical trial to determine if prophylactic anticonvulsants in brain tumour patients (without prior seizures) reduced seizure frequency. We stopped accrual at 100 patients on the basis of the interim analysis. Methods: One hundred newly diagnosed brain tumour patients received anticonvulsants (AC Group) or not (No AC Group) in this prospective randomized unblinded study. Sixty patients had metastatic, and 40 had primary brain tumours. Forty-six (46%) patients were randomized to the AC Group and 54 (54%) to the No AC Group. Median follow-up was 5.44 months (range 0.13 -30.1 months). Results: Seizures occurred in 26 (26%) patients, eleven in the AC Group and 15 in the No AC Group. Seizure-free survivals were not different; at three months 87% of the AC Group and 90% of the No AC Group were seizure-free (log rank test, p=0.98). Seventy patients died (unrelated to seizures) and survival rates were equivalent in both groups (median survival = 6.8 months versus 5.6 months, respectively; log rank test, p=0.50). We then terminated accrual at 100 patients because seizure and survival rates were much lower than expected; we would need ≥ 900 patients to have a suitably powered study. Conclusions: These data should be used by individuals contemplating a clinical trial to determine if prophylactic anticonvulsants are effective in subsets of brain tumour patients (e.g. only anaplastic astrocytomas). When taken together with the results of a similar randomized trial, prophylactic anticonvulsants are unlikely to be effective or useful in brain tumour patients who have not had a seizure.RÉSUMÉ: Une question importante en neuro-oncologie à la quelle il est difficile de répondre: l'utilité des anticonvulsivants prophylactique chez les patients porteurs d'une tumeur cérébrale. Objectif: Nous avons procédé à un essai thérapeutique pour déterminer si les anticonvulsivants administrés de façon préventive chez les patients porteurs d'une tumeur cérébrale, sans épisode convulsif antérieur, réduisent la fréquence des crises épileptiques. Nous avons limité le recrutement à 100 patients suite à une analyse intérimaire. Méthodes: Cent patients, atteints de tumeurs cérébrales dont le diagnostic était récent, ont reçu des anticonvulsivants (groupe AC) ou n'en ont pas reçu (groupe sans AC) dans le cadre d'un...

Although a rare breast cancer subtype, MBC is of considerable interest due to its pathological heterogeneity and differences in clinical behavior compared to typical breast carcinomas. Increasing pathologic recognition of MBC as a discrete entity is suggested by the number of MBC diagnoses in the last decade compared to previous years. The poor DFS associated with MBC suggests that further research exploring mechanisms of carcinogenesis and identifying clinically relevant prognostic factors is needed to direct optimum clinical care. Importantly, MBC variants appear to rarely overexpress the HER2/neu oncoprotein.

Immunohistochemistry is used on cell blocks constructed from cytopathology samples fixed in methanol-based fixatives, such as CytoLyt (Cytyc Corp), and on surgical pathology tissues exposed to decalcifying agents, often without technical validation. We evaluated a panel of commonly utilized antibodies in normal tissues exposed to differing preanalytic conditions as follows: CytoLyt fixation, formalin fixation followed by exposure to decalcifying agents (Leica Decalcifier I-10% formic acid or Leica Decalcifier II-5% hydrochloric acid), or standard formalin fixation. Altered expression was observed with several antibodies compared with standard formalin fixation. Specifically, there was absent or near absent expression of thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), D2-40, and CD20 in CytoLyt-fixed tissues, whereas reduced expression was observed for p63, estrogen receptor, S100 protein, CD3, calretinin, chromogranin, and synaptophysin. Absent or near absent expression of TTF-1 was also observed with exposure to hydrochloric acid, whereas reduced expression was observed for CK5/6, CK7, p63, estrogen receptor, leukocyte common antigen, CD3, CD20, and synaptophysin. Exposure to formic acid had less impact with reduced expression observed for only 3 antibodies (CK8/18, CK7, and TTF-1). The results of this study demonstrate the need to validate immunohistochemical protocols on control tissue treated in the same manner as test tissue, including CytoLyt fixation and exposure of tissue to decalcifying agents.

Immunohistochemical and immunocytochemical assays are highly complex diagnostic analyses used to aid in the accurate identification and biologic characterization of tissue types in neoplastic and nonneoplastic diseases. Immunohistochemical tests are applied mainly to the diagnosis of neoplasms. Some immunohistochemical tests provide information of important prognostic and predictive value in selected human neoplasms and, as such, are often critical for the appropriate and effective treatment of patients. This document provides recommendations and opinions of the Canadian Association of Pathologists-Association canadienne des pathologistes National Standards Committee/Immunohistochemistry relevant to clinical immunohistochemical terminology, classification of immunohistochemical tests based on risk assessment, and quality control and quality assurance and summarizes matters to be considered for appropriate immunohistochemical/immunocytochemical test development, performance, and interpretation in diagnostic pathology and laboratory medicine.