2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30134-9_82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerometer Signal Processing for User Activity Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This was attached to the waist of the subjects, following the recommendations of previous works [18,[27][28][29]. Data were digitized (100 samples/s) and transmitted to a laptop system through Bluetooth connection.…”
Section: Procedures and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was attached to the waist of the subjects, following the recommendations of previous works [18,[27][28][29]. Data were digitized (100 samples/s) and transmitted to a laptop system through Bluetooth connection.…”
Section: Procedures and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is the simplest form of greedy feature selection, which is employed by Marais et al [24] to classify sheep behavior, finding the maximum and minimum values for each axis in a frame as the most important feature out of mean, standard deviation, variance, skewness, kurtosis, energy, frequency-domain entropy, correlation between axes, and average signal magnitude. This combination of features is widely used in activity classification [2,4,25,37]. Previous approaches either select features by using randomly selected training and test data from the full dataset [24], providing similar proportions of each specimen's data in both the training and the test set by visual or statistical analysis [33], or by comparing various feature combinations found in the literature to reach the highest performing combination [16,36].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After testing a wide range of features [3] [15], we selected the following four features based on classification accuracy and computational cost. Details are shown in the table in Figure 5 .…”
Section: Naive Bayes Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%