2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varying behavior of different window sizes on the classification of static and dynamic physical activities from a single accelerometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings regarding the decrease in performance are in line with the recent work by Fida et al [21] who analyzed the effect of varying window size from w = 1 s to 3 s and suggests that 1 s to 2 s window size gives a better tradeoff when analyzing static and dynamic activities. On the contrary, more recently Shoaib et al [22] proposed a system for complex human activity recognition by varying window sizes from 1 s to 30 s and found that increasing window size improves the recognition rate of complex activities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings regarding the decrease in performance are in line with the recent work by Fida et al [21] who analyzed the effect of varying window size from w = 1 s to 3 s and suggests that 1 s to 2 s window size gives a better tradeoff when analyzing static and dynamic activities. On the contrary, more recently Shoaib et al [22] proposed a system for complex human activity recognition by varying window sizes from 1 s to 30 s and found that increasing window size improves the recognition rate of complex activities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Due to the large diversity in the design process, the existing PAC systems are not directly comparable which hinders the development of new techniques informed by the strengths and the gaps in these systems. Another issue is that most of the existing PAC systems used younger subjects for data collection [3,4,5,6,9,10,13,14,17,21,22] and few systems collected data on older subjects [11,23,24,25,26]. Furthermore, most PAC systems are developed in a controlled environment, which is quite different from real-life conditions [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF showed its superior performance in all the considered evaluation metrics, contributing the highest accuracy of 95.72%, which is even higher than the highest accuracy obtained from [155]. It also achieved the best performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, F-measure and ROC area measures (95.7%, 99.3%, 0.954 and 0.998, respectively).…”
Section: Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Fida et al [155] presented the impact of window size on the recognition of both short duration, such as sitting, standing and transitions between activities, and long duration activities, such as walking. They found that 1.5 s window size represented the best trade-off value for recognition among activities.…”
Section: Data Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation