1995
DOI: 10.1177/017084069501600105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic Knowledge and Work Jurisdiction in Management

Abstract: Relations between formal, academic knowledge, training in high-level expertise and practical problem-solving activities vary considerably across fields of practice, as well as across societies. Four major kinds of skills development, certification and extent of jurisdictional control over tasks and jobs can be distinguished: craft professional, academic professional, contested academic and research based. Most academically credentialed managerial skills are similar to contested academic skills. These variation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of science production and diffusion, the definition of what should be investigated and taught, with exception of the applied sciences, has never had too much influence, either from the university administration or from external constituencies, such as the students, practitioners, government or industry. However, it is also true that scientific knowledge generated and diffused by universities has never been fully autonomous in the sense that syllabuses contents and the definition of professional skills and evaluation have to be shared with other agents in society like the State or employers and professional groups (WHITLEY 1995).…”
Section: Institution-led or Market-led: Implications For The Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of science production and diffusion, the definition of what should be investigated and taught, with exception of the applied sciences, has never had too much influence, either from the university administration or from external constituencies, such as the students, practitioners, government or industry. However, it is also true that scientific knowledge generated and diffused by universities has never been fully autonomous in the sense that syllabuses contents and the definition of professional skills and evaluation have to be shared with other agents in society like the State or employers and professional groups (WHITLEY 1995).…”
Section: Institution-led or Market-led: Implications For The Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of autonomy will depend on the kind of problems it addresses: if more concrete or abstract in nature, on the extent to which the profession is institutionalised and if that university training is recognised as important by society (WHITLEY 1995). When the nature of knowledge is concrete in a context where professional institutionalisation is low, if university training is not recognised as being important, and if there is high demand for enrolment, academic autonomy can be reasonable but could still be influenced by pressures from practitioners (WHITLEY 1995). In general the more a field of knowledge is grounded on research activities, and the more it is based on formal abstract knowledge, the more the academics are able to define the contents of their task and to lay dawn the rules for their own performance evaluation.…”
Section: Institution-led or Market-led: Implications For The Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations