Abusive supervision: exploring the relationship with narcissism, self-promotion and unpredictability

Abstract

PurposeThis study investigates whether subordinates who rate their managers higher on narcissism are also more likely to view their managers as abusive. In particular, the study explores the extent to which managers whom subordinates rate higher on narcissism use certain behaviors (self-promotion and unpredictability) that mediate the relationship between narcissism and perceived abuse.Design/methodology/approachSurvey participants (n = 949) rated their most-destructive manager in terms of self-promotion, unpredictability, narcissism and abusiveness. A bootstrap analysis assessed the positive, mediating effects of leader self-promotion and unpredictability on the narcissism–abuse relationship.FindingsDegree of perceived supervisor narcissism predicted subordinates' perceptions of abusive supervision. However, the supervisor's self-promotion activities and unpredictability fully mediated this relationship.Research limitations/implicationsThis study identifies perceived narcissism as an antecedent of abusive supervision and identifies two mediators relevant to subordinates' perceptions of abuse. Using multiple methods and multiple sources, the authors recommend that scholars identify additional mediators. Further research should consider variables such as gender, organizational culture and occupational status.Practical implicationsFindings highlight how subordinates connect supervisor narcissism to abuse; this allows human resource practitioners to better predict and address subordinates' perceptions of their managers and to design interventions for improving supervisors' behaviors.Originality/valueThis study helps in explaining destructive leadership by empirically examining perceptions of narcissism as a driver of abusive supervision. Also, the study reveals the characteristics of narcissistic managers that impede productive relationships with subordinates.

Do self-esteem and ethical leadership dampens Machiavellianism–effectiveness relationship: a parallel mediation approach

“…Globalization, a turbulent economic environment, intense competition and the Covid-19 pandemic have changed the industry set up in the past, requiring effective leadership to confront these challenges (Mandal, 2020). Business leaders work under a great deal of stress to meet the performance standards of the firms (Finney et al. , 2021).…”

“…Globalization, a turbulent economic environment, intense competition and the Covid-19 pandemic have changed the industry set up in the past, requiring effective leadership to confront these challenges (Mandal, 2020). Business leaders work under a great deal of stress to meet the performance standards of the firms (Finney et al, 2021). Recent researchers on leadership recognized the need for the study of leaders' effectiveness and ethical leadership due to a series of corporate scandals (Frazier and Jacezko, 2021).…”

Self-promotion and online shaming during COVID-19: A toxic combination

“…derogatory remarks on the body shape and sexual conduct of the target) are prevalent in SM ( Valentine et al, 2018 ; Pilch and Turska, 2015 ). Negative characteristics of behaviour are reflected in self-promotion ( Finney et al, 2021 ), which can be shaming in SM. People who are driven by self-promotion and have poor self-control are more prone to post unverified information, which contributes to SM fatigue and shame ( Islam et al, 2020 ).…”

Assessing the impact of corporate environmental irresponsibility on workplace deviant behavior of generation Z and millennials: a multigroup analysis

“…Thus, it is essential to analyzing the association between corporate social irresponsibility and WDBs of nonmanagerial members of Generation Z and Millennials, working in organizations whose social irresponsibility is proved in the court of law. Because often the nonmanagerial employees are considerably affected by the policies and behaviors of managerial employees (Finney et al , 2021). The motivation mechanism behind WDB is to seek revenge and punish the organizations for their unjust actions (Goh and Kong, 2018).…”

“…In developing economies, 20% of businesses failure are prompted by employee deviant behaviors (Robinson et al , 2019). Thus, testing the association between CEI and WDB of nonmanagerial employees may lead to understanding the question of WDB from nonmanagerial employee’s perspective because the polices and behaviors of the executives greatly affects the nonmanagerial employees leading to discontentment among them (Finney et al , 2021).…”