Absorptive Capacity and Innovation: When Is It Better to Cooperate?

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. for recent empirical findings and explicitly modeling absorptive capacity within the framework of interactive learning. We apply that to the analysis of firms' cooperation and R&D investment preferences. While the focus of this paper is limited to a static scenario, where the cognitive distance between cooperating firms is fixed and given exogenously, in Savin and Egbetokun (2012) we address the dynamic approach and provide more extensive simulation results. Terms of use: Documents in

Absorptive capacity, marketing capabilities, and innovation commercialisation in Nigeria

“…The results of this study support our hypotheses to a large extent. We find that absorptive capacity as measured by openness and formal training facilitates the assimilation and use of external knowledge that enhances innovation performance (da Costa et al, 2018;Egbetokun, 2015;Egbetokun and Savin, 2014;Foss et al, 2011;Onyeiwu, 2015;Ritala et al, 2015;Xia and Roper, 2016). Similar to previous studies, we find evidence of an inverted U-shaped relation between openness and innovation performance (Drechsler and Natter, 2012;Laursen and Salter, 2006;Leiponen and Helfat, 2010;Vahter et al, 2014).…”

Can CEOs’ Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation Improve Firms’ Cooperation in International Scenarios?

“…Additionally, absorptive capacity is key to learning from others. Firms choose to cooperate and select their partners conditional on the investments in absorptive capacity they are willing to make [77]. Hence, future studies should incorporate proxies of absorptive capacity and spillovers.…”

Research on Decision-making of Main Manufacturer-supplier Participating in Complex Equipment Based on Time Coupling

“…In the law of knowledge Ohm, the essence of knowledge transfer is the potential difference, which is called the knowledge potential difference in this paper. Liao et al [11] deeply studied the influence and mechanism of knowledge potential difference on knowledge transfer performance, and had certain influence on decision-making subject knowledge input and transfer strategy; De Jong et al [12], [13] and other scholars believe that the input of absorptive capacity affects the relationship between knowledge potential and absorptive capacity. If the investment in absorptive capacity is increased, it will help to enhance the understanding of knowledge and promote cooperation between subjects.…”

“…In order to enable suppliers to participate in collaborative development in advance and maximize the overall revenue of the supply chain, that is, when the amount of knowledge transfer is the maximum, the R&D manufacturing system is optimal at this time. When the knowledge transfer amount is optimized, the general calculation method is more complicated for solving the above formula (13). Therefore, this paper uses MATLAB to solve the problem.…”