Can CEOs’ Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation Improve Firms’ Cooperation in International Scenarios?

Moreno, Ángela González; Ruíz-Palomino, Pablo; Sáez‐Martínez, Francisco J.

doi:10.3390/su11246936

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Gonzalez‐Moreno et al. 's (2019) examine how CEOs' corporate social responsibility orientation improves firms' cooperation in international scenarios. Using a sample of internationalized Spanish firms, they show that acting in good faith and inter‐organizational trust become particularly relevant for business success and competitive advantage when firms act in hostile international markets.…”

Section: Relationality As a Common Focus In Transaction Cost Economic...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationality in transaction cost economics and stakeholder theory: A new conceptual framework

Valentinov,

Roth

2024

Business Ethics Env & Resp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stakeholder scholars have long explored how stakeholder relationships differ from economic transactions. We contribute to this ongoing inquiry by developing a conceptual framework of relationality in stakeholder theory that encompasses a stakeholder‐theoretic extension of Williamson's contracting schema and a new typology of stakeholder relationships. Premised on understanding relationality as the need for informal human relationships beyond formal governance, our framework locates the key difference between transaction cost economics and stakeholder theory in their treatment of informal relationships. While transaction cost economics perceives informal relationships to be shaped by formal governance structures and enforced by contractual safeguards, stakeholder theory is open to the possibility that some informal relationships between stakeholders may be genuinely moral and thus irreducible to formal governance and contractual safeguards. These stakeholder relationships may lead to unique economic effects described by instrumental stakeholder theory. The difference that we identified between the two literatures shows how stakeholder theory's embrace of relationality surpasses that of transaction cost economics.

show abstract

Section: Relationality As a Common Focus In Transaction Cost Economic...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationality in transaction cost economics and stakeholder theory: A new conceptual framework

Valentinov,

Roth

2024

Business Ethics Env & Resp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…González-Moreno et al [63] This paper analyzed the role of the chief executive officer's (CEO) corporate social responsibility orientation on interfirm cooperation.…”

Section: Goal 17mentioning

confidence: 99%

On Earth as It Is in Heaven: Proxy Measurements to Assess Sustainable Development Goals at the Company Level through CSR Indicators

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, we have witnessed dramatic changes in the following two regards: First, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices have become ubiquitous in companies, and second, the challenge that Sustainable Development (SD) presents to society and to the planet has been illustrated in the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In this context, this study aims to identify the extent to which companies address the SDGs through their CSR practices. We conducted the present research by first performing a content analysis to determine the communalities between CSR practices and the SDGs. Then, we performed a quantitative analysis to assess the performance of various companies in terms of common aspects of CSR and SDGs. The main findings are as follows: (1) Not all SDGs are related to CSR practices; (2) companies perform differently in their CSR practices and, consequently, make different contributions to the SDGs; and (3) there is little difference among company profiles regarding their performances in CSR practices towards the SDGs. The main contributions of this study are, first, that it provides a new perspective on the relationship between CSR and SD and, second, the creation of a list of what can be considered the minimum requirements for CSR practices if the SDGs are to be reached.

show abstract

“…Executive managers can lead organizations to practice responsible behaviors through the formal structure established by directing subordinate managers and employees to consider and attend the expressed demands by both the internal and external stakeholders (González-Moreno, Ruiz-Palomino, & Sáez-Martínez, 2019;Swanson, 1999). In addition, top managers can shape and reinforce responsible organizational culture through various informal ways to which organization members pay attention more than the espoused social policies and programs (Crane et al, 2009).…”

Section: Fig 1 Concept Framework Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

A link between top managers’ perception and corporate social responsibility

Tefera

Liu

2019

IJRBS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Though it is called corporate social responsibility (CSR), it is the people in the organization particularly, top managers who develop and get implemented corporate social policies. Organization behavior is the reflection of their top managers. However, exploration of the role of top managers in spreading CSR in the organization is scant in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of top managers’ CSR perceptions on firm-level CSR in Ethiopia. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data from 294 executive managers of four sectors, namely textile, food, bank, and floriculture industries. Multiple hierarchical regression and process macro 3.3 were employed to analyze the data with the aid of SPSS. The analysis reveals that top managers’ CSR perception is a significant predictor of firm-level CSR behaviors. The result also shows that corporate ethical culture fully mediates the relationship between top managers’ CSR perception and organization CSR. Moreover, transformational leadership has a moderating effect between the direct top managers’ CSR perception and firm-level CSR relationship.

show abstract

Can CEOs’ Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation Improve Firms’ Cooperation in International Scenarios?

Cited by 9 publications

References 74 publications

Relationality in transaction cost economics and stakeholder theory: A new conceptual framework

Relationality in transaction cost economics and stakeholder theory: A new conceptual framework

On Earth as It Is in Heaven: Proxy Measurements to Assess Sustainable Development Goals at the Company Level through CSR Indicators

A link between top managers’ perception and corporate social responsibility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About