1987
DOI: 10.1039/f29878302073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute determinations of the kinetics and temperature dependences of the reactions of OH with a series of alkynes

Abstract: The rates of reaction of OH with propyne, but-l-yne, but-2-yne, pent-l-yne and hex-l-yne have been measured directly by using a discharge-flow resonance-fluorescence technique over a range of temperatures from 253 to 343 K. The room-temperature rate coefficients-are compared with previous determinations; the new values for pent-l-yne and hex-l-yne fit into a general pattern of reactivity consistent with a mechanism involving initial electrophilic attack of OH at the triple bond. Similar trends are also present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are the first obtained below 253 K, and overall k 4 shows a weak temperature dependence, significantly less than for ethene, but again, consistent with the rule of Smith et al 2 Previously, this reaction has been studied by Boodaghians et al 49 who observed a weak temperature 1060 dependence between between 253-343 K using the dischargeflow resonance fluorescence method, but did not observe any significant pressure dependence over the limited range studied (1.7 -6. twice that of Boodaghians et al 49 , suggesting that both the study of Boodaghians et al 49 and of our own are in the fall-off region. The very high value for k 4 obtained by Bradley et al 52 in 1973 using ESR at 2.5 Torr appears to be inconsistent with our and all previous data.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…These results are the first obtained below 253 K, and overall k 4 shows a weak temperature dependence, significantly less than for ethene, but again, consistent with the rule of Smith et al 2 Previously, this reaction has been studied by Boodaghians et al 49 who observed a weak temperature 1060 dependence between between 253-343 K using the dischargeflow resonance fluorescence method, but did not observe any significant pressure dependence over the limited range studied (1.7 -6. twice that of Boodaghians et al 49 , suggesting that both the study of Boodaghians et al 49 and of our own are in the fall-off region. The very high value for k 4 obtained by Bradley et al 52 in 1973 using ESR at 2.5 Torr appears to be inconsistent with our and all previous data.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…The experimental result of Bradley et al [17] is subject to a factor of 4 error due to a mistake in the data analysis as pointed out by Boodaghians et al [14]; here we show the corrected (higher) value. Although our unadjusted ME calculation underpredicts the rate coefficients, it clearly shows the effect of pressure and also the slight negative temperature dependence observed by Boodaghians et al [14]. A very modest, À0.35 kcal mol À1 , adjustment to both addition transition states results in almost perfect agreement with the experiments, especially when the small, but non-negligible, contribution from abstraction is also included.…”
Section: The Propyne + Oh Allene + Oh Reactions and The Dissociatiomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…2 shows the calculated rate coefficients below $350 K for the propyne + OH reaction at various pressures. The apparent scatter in the experimental data is mostly due to pressure effects: the experiments of Atkinson and Aschmann [12] and Hatakeyama et al [16] were done at around one atmosphere, while the other ones [14,15,17] were done at low (1-6.4 Torr) pressures. The experimental result of Bradley et al [17] is subject to a factor of 4 error due to a mistake in the data analysis as pointed out by Boodaghians et al [14]; here we show the corrected (higher) value.…”
Section: The Propyne + Oh Allene + Oh Reactions and The Dissociatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations