According to the classical paradigm of the judicial act, the courthouse is a temple and the hearing is a ceremony. Even when secularized, justice rests upon a ritual and a ceremonial which confer on it both its sacredness and its authority. The origins of this staging are rooted in myth, religion and cosmogony which stem from the mediation of symbols. Through this ornamentation, the paternal figure is made present and guarantees, in a kind of irrational way, the authority of the institution. Since the mid nineties, the judicial institution has been emancipated from its staging. The modern goals of functionality and transparency of public services have progressively led to the abandoning of the sacredness of the judicial act, thus threatening its symbolic function. The purpose of this contribution is to highlight, through a semiotic approach, the dialectic opposing modernity and the authority of the judicial institution. 1 Jean Carbonnier (1908 was an eminent French professor of civil Law who renewed the French Civil Code. His writings are open to the sociology of law and the philosophy of law. 2 Sic. «Tout lieu d'audience, dans les socie´te´s archaı¨ques, est une aire sacre´e […] comme retranche´e du monde ordinaire» [6:17].