2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified design approach for plate-reinforced composite coupling beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is found that such ratios ranged from 0.4 to 1.2. A similar study by Su and Lam (2009) for internal steel plate strengthened coupling beams reveals that this ratio is a function of various parameters, including the plate thickness to beam width ratio, longitudinal steel ratio and span-to-depth ratio of the beam. Paulay (1971) considered the effects of truss and arch actions in RC coupling beams and proposed the following equation to estimate the beam elongation.…”
Section: Estimation Of Axial Forcementioning
confidence: 65%
“…It is found that such ratios ranged from 0.4 to 1.2. A similar study by Su and Lam (2009) for internal steel plate strengthened coupling beams reveals that this ratio is a function of various parameters, including the plate thickness to beam width ratio, longitudinal steel ratio and span-to-depth ratio of the beam. Paulay (1971) considered the effects of truss and arch actions in RC coupling beams and proposed the following equation to estimate the beam elongation.…”
Section: Estimation Of Axial Forcementioning
confidence: 65%
“…In practice, it is more desirable for the plate to share about 50% of the total load resistance. The results in the present study have enhanced the development of a comprehensive design procedure for the PRC coupling beams [ 18 ]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…where f c is the nominal compressive strength of the concrete, b c is the beam section width, h 0 is the beam section effective depth, A st is the area of transverse reinforcement, f yt is the nominal yield strength of transverse reinforcement, s is the spacing of transverse reinforcement, R y is the ratio of the expected to nominal yield strength of structural steel, f a is the nominal yield strength of structural steel, t w is the web thickness of encased steel, H s is the cross-sectional height of encased steel, and t f is the flange thickness of encased steel. Su and Lam [6] tested eight half-scale steel plate-reinforced concrete coupling beams of short and medium-length spans and proposed a unified design approach. Motter et al [3] tested four one-half scale flexure-yielding SRC coupling beams embedded into reinforced concrete structural walls for realistic loading conditions and found that with adequate encased steel embedment and wall reinforcement, the performance of flexure-yielding SRC coupling beams can meet or exceed that of conventionally or diagonally reinforced concrete coupling beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a number of SRC coupling beams have been tested [4][5][6][7][8], those results generally showed that SRC coupling beams can provide good seismic behavior; stirrups, longitudinal rebars, and embedment of encased steel have a significant impact on the failure modes of SRC coupling beams. However, those researches paid little attention to SRC coupling beam damage development during the whole loading process, which is an important reference in assessing the seismic performance of structures or structural components [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation