2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-update ensemble Kalman filter for land hydrological data assimilation with an uncertain constraint

Abstract: Assimilating Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) data into land hydrological models provides a valuable opportunity to improve the models' forecasts and increases our knowledge of terrestrial water storages (TWS). The assimilation, however, may harm the consistency between hydrological water fluxes, namely precipitation, evaporation, discharge, and water storage changes. To address this issue, we propose a weak constrained ensemble Kalman filter (WCEnKF) that maintains estimated water budgets in ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the narrow range of storage dynamics in surface soil moisture, the improvement was less significant in this layer with the groundwater level, as the most significant contributor, receiving the greatest improvement. This corroborates the results from previous studies (e.g., Girotto et al, ; Khaki, Hoteit, et al, ; Khaki, Ait‐El‐Fquih, et al, ; Schumacher et al, ; Shokri, Walker, van Dijk & Pauwels ; Tian et al, ; Zaitchik et al, ). Conversely, the accuracy of the EnKF with initial α Q =2 (twice the reference error magnitude) slightly degraded in both soil layers and groundwater, comparing to OL.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the narrow range of storage dynamics in surface soil moisture, the improvement was less significant in this layer with the groundwater level, as the most significant contributor, receiving the greatest improvement. This corroborates the results from previous studies (e.g., Girotto et al, ; Khaki, Hoteit, et al, ; Khaki, Ait‐El‐Fquih, et al, ; Schumacher et al, ; Shokri, Walker, van Dijk & Pauwels ; Tian et al, ; Zaitchik et al, ). Conversely, the accuracy of the EnKF with initial α Q =2 (twice the reference error magnitude) slightly degraded in both soil layers and groundwater, comparing to OL.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It has been proven that the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) can improve the accuracy of hydrologic models by merging observations with model predictions. Such observations include soil moisture (e.g., Aubert et al, ; Crow & Ryu, ; Houser et al, ; Pauwels et al, ; Reichle et al, , ; Walker & Houser, ), snow water equivalent (e.g., Barrett, ; Slater & Clark, ; Sun et al, ), streamflow (e.g., Lee et al, ; Clark et al, ), groundwater levels (e.g., Hendricks Franssen et al, ), turbulent heat fluxes (e.g., Bateni & Entekhabi, ; Pipunic et al, ; Xu et al, ) , microwave radiances (e.g., Dechant & Moradkhani, ), and terrestrial water storage (TWS; e.g., Ellett et al, ; Forman & Reichle, ; Forman et al, ; Girotto et al, ; ; Houborg et al, ; Khaki, Ait‐El‐Fquih, et al, ; Khaki, Hoteit, et al,; Khaki, Schumacher, et al, ; Kumar et al, ; Li et al, ; Li & Rodell, ; Smith, ; Tian et al, ; van Dijk et al, ; Zaitchik et al, ). The idea behind the EnKF is to combine observations and model estimates of state variables considering their relative error covariances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) is a very useful data assimilation (DA) tool to reduce the model errors at each time step by updating the model state variables (Evensen, 2003). DA methods have been successfully applied in hydrologic modeling to assimilate observations from various sources into the model, including soil moisture (e.g., Aubert et al, 2003;Crow & Ryu, 2009;Houser et al, 1998;Pauwels et al, 2001;Reichle et al, 2008Reichle et al, , 2004, snow water equivalent (e.g., Barrett, 2003;Slater & Clark, 2006;Sun et al, 2004), streamflow (e.g., Clark et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2011), groundwater levels (e.g., Hendricks Franssen et al, 2017, microwave radiances (e.g., Dechant & Moradkhani, 2011), and TWS (e.g., van Dijk et al, 2014;Ellett et al, 2006;Forman & Reichle, 2013;Forman et al, 2012;Girotto et al, 2016Girotto et al, , 2017Houborg et al, 2012;Khaki, Ait-El-Fquih, et al, 2017;Khaki, Schumacher, et al, 2017;Kumar et al, 2016;Li & Rodell, 2015;Li et al, 2012;Smith, 2013;Tian et al, 2017;Zaitchik et al, 2008). Therefore, assimilating the GRACE TWS retrievals into a hydrological model yields more reliable water storage estimates in which the drawbacks of both approaches are mitigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, hydrological models can be applied to much larger spatial scales, as on a continental or even a global level. This permits the study of the global consequences of the hydrological cycle (Brakenridge et al 2012, Sperna Weiland et al 2012, Decharme et al 2014and Khaki et al 2017. In accordance with the increasing proportion of research at a continental or world level, the percentage of international cooperation in research activities has been increasing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%