2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-stage model for rate-dependent inverse hysteresis in reluctance actuators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. The controller is the algorithm (34) with Γ η and Θ s being replaced by Γ η,ex in (30) and Θ s,ex in (15), respectively. The controller's sampling interval is set as T = 0.01 s unless otherwise noted, the time constant for the sliding surface is set as H = 1 s, and the desired position is fixed as p d ≡ 1 m. Here, notice that the sampling interval T of the controller is set much larger than the timestep size h of the plant simulation.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4. The controller is the algorithm (34) with Γ η and Θ s being replaced by Γ η,ex in (30) and Θ s,ex in (15), respectively. The controller's sampling interval is set as T = 0.01 s unless otherwise noted, the time constant for the sliding surface is set as H = 1 s, and the desired position is fixed as p d ≡ 1 m. Here, notice that the sampling interval T of the controller is set much larger than the timestep size h of the plant simulation.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been employed mainly for actuators with hysteresis [12]- [14]. Previous studies have investigated applications to piezoactuators [12], magnetostrictive actuators [14], shape memory alloys [14], reluctance motors [15], and electro-hydraulic systems [16]. Other types of nonlinearity, such as dead-zone and backlash [13] and creep [12], have also been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is the magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) approach, which results in low-order dynamical models well suited for control or estimation, as well as for computationally inexpensive simulations [5], [6], [12]. Although these models only capture the dynamics of a small number of variables, they can be made very accurate by including phenomena such as eddy currents or magnetic saturation and hysteresis [13], [14]. The second approach is the use of high-order numerical models, e.g., those based on the finite element method [4], [15], which provide much more detailed results, but are generally computationally expensive and not appropriate for some classes of analysis.…”
Section: Coilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the data‐driven models describe hysteresis based on the measured data of PEAs without considering the physical mechanism, 22 some typical data‐driven hysteresis models include Bouc–Wen model, 23 Preisach model, 24 Prandtl–Ishlinskii model, 25,26 Krasnoselskii–Pokrovskii model, 27 fuzzy model, 28 neural‐network‐based model 29‐31 . In addition, apart from the above classic models, many improved composite models have also been reported in latest literatures 15,32‐35 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31] In addition, apart from the above classic models, many improved composite models have also been reported in latest literatures. 15,[32][33][34][35] Although compensation for hysteresis can improve the tracking performance of the PEA, unknown external disturbance still easily causes the PEA to deviate from the desired displacement. 36 To address this issue, researchers have designed lots of advanced controllers to further improve the tracking accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%