1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02668205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A transgranular fatigue crack growth model based on restricted slip reversibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frong and Thomas and Wu, Koul and Krausz used the concept of irreversible slip at the cracktip resulting in the zigzag crack extension during the stage II growth period (Fig. ).…”
Section: Dislocation Irreversibility Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frong and Thomas and Wu, Koul and Krausz used the concept of irreversible slip at the cracktip resulting in the zigzag crack extension during the stage II growth period (Fig. ).…”
Section: Dislocation Irreversibility Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pippan studied the force required to emit dislocations at the crack tip and related the quantity of emitted dislocations that do not fully reverse to the crack growth rate [17,18]. Wu et al related the plastic strain ahead of the crack tip, due to slip irreversibility, to the fatigue crack growth rate [19]. A technique using DIC has been developed to determine the quantity of residual crack tip plastic strain and has been demonstrated for several materials at room temperature [7,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 does not include the plasticity ahead of the crack tip, but contains terms for the shear stress along the crack propagating direction and the principal stress state. The majority of the existing metrics, describing fatigue crack propagation direction and rate, available in the literature Table 2 are proportional to the accumulated microplasticity ahead of the crack tip 21,[32][33][34][35]48 ; however, this assumption is not supported by the available data. The comparison of Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%