2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep26169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-terminal ultraviolet photodetector constructed on a barrier-modulated triple-layer architecture

Abstract: We report a novel three-terminal device fabricated on MgZnO/ZnO/MgZnO triple-layer architecture. Because of the combined barrier modulation effect by both gate and drain biases, the device shows an unconventional I-V characteristics compared to a common field effect transistor. The photoresponse behavior of this unique device was also investigated and applied in constructing a new type ultraviolet (UV) photodetector, which may be potentially used as an active element in a UV imaging array. More significantly, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that this PD works properly as a Schottky barrier phototransistor. Similar three-terminal PDs have been constructed on MgZnO/ZnO/MgZnO/Si, which showed the same modulation (Ye et al, 2016). Furthermore, we find that I p is proportional to the light intensity when the device is exposed to different light powers (the result is not shown here), that is to say, the device performance is affected by the tested light intensity, as reported on the similar PDs (Feng et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This indicates that this PD works properly as a Schottky barrier phototransistor. Similar three-terminal PDs have been constructed on MgZnO/ZnO/MgZnO/Si, which showed the same modulation (Ye et al, 2016). Furthermore, we find that I p is proportional to the light intensity when the device is exposed to different light powers (the result is not shown here), that is to say, the device performance is affected by the tested light intensity, as reported on the similar PDs (Feng et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…[ 1–4 ] So far two‐terminal Ga 2 O 3 photodetectors (PDs) are the most commonly investigated, but a slow response speed caused by persistent photoconductivity (PPC) effect [ 5,6 ] impedes the further promotion of devices' performance. [ 7 ] As is well known to all, PPC phenomenon occurs in most oxide semiconductor materials owing to the large quantity of oxygen vacancy ( V o ) defects and high density of trap states. [ 8,9 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photovoltaic PD is built upon the foundation of having an in-built charge separation mechanism and has a faster response time but the detection signal cannot be amplified. In contrast, a three-terminal phototransistor with one more terminal-gate to flexibly control the carrier transport is attractive for UV PDs. Although Ga 2 O 3 phototransistor PDs have been demonstrated previously, most of them are based on high-cost mechanical exfoliated single-crystal Cr-doped Ga 2 O 3 . In addition, the dark current is usually high leading to high power consumption and introduce interference to image application or communication application .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%