A Template‐Free Method Towards Conducting Polymer Nanostructures

Abstract

Conducting polymer nanostructures have recently received special attention in nanoscience and nanotechnology because of their highly π‐conjugated polymeric chains and metal‐like conductivity, such that they can be regarded not only as excellent molecular wires, but also as basic units for the formation of nanodevices. Although various approaches, such as hard‐template methods, soft‐template methods, electrospinning technology, and so on are widely employed to synthesize or fabricate conducting polymer nanostructures and their composite nanostructures, each of the currently used methods possess disadvantages. Therefore, finding a facile, efficient, and controlled method of forming conducting polymer nanostructures is desirable. Similar to other nanomaterials, the effect of size (in these cases 1–100 nm) on the properties of the conducting polymer nanostructures must be considered. Electrical measurements of single nanotubes or nanowires are desirable in order to be able to understand the pure electrical properties of conducting polymer nanostructures. Compared with bulk conducting polymers, conducting polymer nanostructures are expected to display improved performance in technological applications because of the unique properties arising from their nanometer‐scaled size: high conductivity, large surface area, and light weight. Thus, it is also desirable to develop promising applications for conducting polymer nanostructures. In accordance with the issues described above, our research focuses on a new synthesis method to form conducting polymer nanostructures and on the related formation mechanism of the resultant nanostructures. The electrical and transport properties of single nanotubes of conducting polymer, measured by a four‐probe method, and promising applications of such template‐free‐synthesized conducting polymer nanostructures as new microwave absorbing materials and sensors guided by a reversible wettability are also of interest. This article reports some of our main results and reviews some important contributions of others.

Synthesis of ferrofluid based nanoarchitectured polypyrrole composites and its application for electromagnetic shielding

“…It has been observed that the morphology of the micro/nanostructures is strongly affected by the structure of the monomer, dopant, and an oxidant, as well as by the preparation conditions. The preparation conditions include the concentrations of dopant, oxidant, monomer, and the molar ratio of the dopant and oxidant to monomer, as well as the reaction temperature, time, and stirring [26]. Interestingly, in the present system, these factors are same for all PFF composites but a change in morphology was observed due to variation in the concentration of ferrofluid in the feed system.…”

Mechanism of formation of templateless electrogenerated polypyrrole nanostructures

“…Indeed, polypyrrole nanostructures can be easily synthesized [1], [2], [3] by a chemical or an electrochemical way using templates such as soft-templates [4], [5], [6], hardtemplates [7], [8], [9] or wire-templates [1], [2], or without the use of templates [10], [11], [12]. In the last case, polypyrrole nanostructures can be electrogenerated in the presence of a high concentration of weak-acid anions which confer to the pyrrole solution a pH between 6 and 10 and of non-acidic anions such as perchlorate ions.…”

Recent Advances in Nanostructured Conducting Polymers: from Synthesis to Practical Applications

“…One of the frequently cited methods is in situ polymerization using protonic acids (e.g., β-naphthalenesulfonic acid) as dopants [41]. The main feature of this method is that the micelle-like structures formed by the monomer and dopant act as "molecular templates" during polymerization.…”