2008
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2008.302.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Technical Review of Compressed Natural Gas as an Alternative Fuel for Internal Combustion Engines

Abstract: Natural gas is promising alternative fuel to meet strict engine emission regulations in many countries. Compressed natural gas (CNG) has long been used in stationary engines, but the application of CNG as a transport engines fuel has been considerably advanced over the last decade by the development of lightweight high-pressure storage cylinders. Engine conversion technology is well established and suitable conversion equipment is readily available. For spark ignition engines there are two options, a bi-fuel c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such arrangement provides a back-up fuel where gaseous refuelling facilities are not well developed. Gaseous fuels have low energy density resulting in low engine performance, low engine volumetric efficiency, and need of pressurized storage vessel [14,16]. However large pressure fuel tank could be utilized but weight, space, performance and cost must be compromised.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Performance Test On Dynamometermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Such arrangement provides a back-up fuel where gaseous refuelling facilities are not well developed. Gaseous fuels have low energy density resulting in low engine performance, low engine volumetric efficiency, and need of pressurized storage vessel [14,16]. However large pressure fuel tank could be utilized but weight, space, performance and cost must be compromised.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Performance Test On Dynamometermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average power output from burning LPG over the speed range of 65-100 km/h was 5.16 hp which was about 3.9% lower than that from using gasoline91 of 5.37 hp. According to Semin et al [14][15][16][17], the performance of the converted bi-fuel engine will generally drop 15-20% in maximum power from the petrol. In general, bi-fuel modified vehicles suffer power loss and encounter drive ability problems as from the design and/or the installation of the retrofit conversion packages.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Performance Test On Dynamometermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A lot of researchers contributed to the liquefied petroleum gas such as, Adzimah and Anthony (2009);Bakar (2008); Lu and Li (2011);Meshkatoddini (2008); Ning and Chan (2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%