2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A taxometric investigation of the latent structure of eating disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This similarity in findings is perhaps not surprising, given extensive data in the broader psychopathology field showing the superiority of dimensional models over categorical frameworks for understanding the underlying structure of psychiatric disorders (e.g., see Wright et al, 2013). Although eating disorders are rarely included in these studies of psychopathology, emerging data suggest that eating disorders may be dimensional in nature (Holm-Denoma, Richey, & Joiner, 2010; Keel, Brown, Holland, & Bodell, 2012; Luo, Donnellan, Burt, & Klump, submitted; Olatunji et al, 2012; Tylka & Subich, 2003). Consequently, although additional research is needed, findings thus far suggest that our studies of emotional eating will advance our understanding of more basic behaviors/phenotypes that have underlying genetic and biological dimensions that likely contribute to risk for clinical eating pathology as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This similarity in findings is perhaps not surprising, given extensive data in the broader psychopathology field showing the superiority of dimensional models over categorical frameworks for understanding the underlying structure of psychiatric disorders (e.g., see Wright et al, 2013). Although eating disorders are rarely included in these studies of psychopathology, emerging data suggest that eating disorders may be dimensional in nature (Holm-Denoma, Richey, & Joiner, 2010; Keel, Brown, Holland, & Bodell, 2012; Luo, Donnellan, Burt, & Klump, submitted; Olatunji et al, 2012; Tylka & Subich, 2003). Consequently, although additional research is needed, findings thus far suggest that our studies of emotional eating will advance our understanding of more basic behaviors/phenotypes that have underlying genetic and biological dimensions that likely contribute to risk for clinical eating pathology as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should target participants with clinical symptoms or a clinical diagnosis, and compare them against non-clinical populations with high levels of perfectionism. Alternately, a student sample could have their propensity towards eating disorders measured on a continuum, instead of an all-or-none diagnosis (Olatunji et al, 2012). Second, participants in both studies were required to act as participants to earn credit for their Introduction to Psychology experimental requirement.…”
Section: Limitations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, this work suggests that the cognitive correlates of disordered eating (e.g., self-reported dietary restraint, body dissatisfaction, drive for thinness) are continuous with normality (i.e., dimensional) (14). However, the underlying structure of ED behaviors is less clear, with some studies reporting that EDs characterized by binge eating are qualitatively distinct from restrictive EDs and normal behavior (i.e., they are categorical or taxonic) (8), and others finding that a dimensional structure best describes the associations among restrictive and binge-eating/purging EDs (15). Finally, it is important to note that taxonic constructs often are characterized by within-group variability that is dimensional in nature (8).…”
Section: Model # 1: Dimensions Of Ed Psychopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%