“…The findings from a systematic review revealed that siblings experience psychological suffering and worse family functioning following TBI in children including behavioural problems in their brother and sisters and absence of perceived social support. The findings largely support that there is a need to grow and evaluate support interventions to improve siblings’ adjustment to the effects of TBI [ 7 ]. Although evidence of efficacy is lacking, however, a number of tactics have been defined in the literature for siblings support in the context of TBI [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious issue and a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Caregivers of TBI patients experience psychological distress and a variety of social and financial issues. The present study aims to investigate the caregiver's burden and the factors that influence this burden. Furthermore, the present study will find out the association of religious practice, religious coping relations and psychological distress among caregivers of children affected with TBI. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 302 caregivers of children with TBI using Duke University Religion Index (DURL) for religious practice. General Health Questionaire-12 (GHQ-12) was used for anxiety and depression and Brief Religious Coping Scale (RCOPE) was used for coping strategies. The caregivers were conveniently chosen from different regions of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province and data was collected from different tertiary care hospitals in Peshawar. Results: Forty-nine (49) % of caregivers score ≥ 3 on GHQ suffer from psychological distress with a Mean of 20.957 ± 4.175). Positive coping methods were mostly used by caregivers than negative coping have a low level of distress with a Mean Positive Coping (P-COPE )of 6.93 ± 0.41, Mean of Negative Coping (N-COPE) 0.486 ± 1.023. In religious practice, caregivers mostly participate in Organized Reliogious Activities (ORA) or some Non-Organized Reliogious Activities (NORA) with a Mean ORA of 4.20 ± 1.27, and NORA Mean of 4.17 ± 1.37 used by the caregivers. Coping methods were related to Caregiver psychological distress (GHQ-12 and P-COPE co-relation scores are (ρ −0.022, p b 0.05); GHQ-12 scores and N-COPE (ρ + 0.221=, p b 0.001). There is a negative correlation between GHQ 12 and PCOPE, while GHQ12 is positively correlated with NCOPE. Conclusion: According to this study, there is a significant association between religious coping methods, religious practice, and psychological distress among caregivers of children with traumatic brain injury.
“…The findings from a systematic review revealed that siblings experience psychological suffering and worse family functioning following TBI in children including behavioural problems in their brother and sisters and absence of perceived social support. The findings largely support that there is a need to grow and evaluate support interventions to improve siblings’ adjustment to the effects of TBI [ 7 ]. Although evidence of efficacy is lacking, however, a number of tactics have been defined in the literature for siblings support in the context of TBI [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious issue and a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Caregivers of TBI patients experience psychological distress and a variety of social and financial issues. The present study aims to investigate the caregiver's burden and the factors that influence this burden. Furthermore, the present study will find out the association of religious practice, religious coping relations and psychological distress among caregivers of children affected with TBI. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 302 caregivers of children with TBI using Duke University Religion Index (DURL) for religious practice. General Health Questionaire-12 (GHQ-12) was used for anxiety and depression and Brief Religious Coping Scale (RCOPE) was used for coping strategies. The caregivers were conveniently chosen from different regions of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province and data was collected from different tertiary care hospitals in Peshawar. Results: Forty-nine (49) % of caregivers score ≥ 3 on GHQ suffer from psychological distress with a Mean of 20.957 ± 4.175). Positive coping methods were mostly used by caregivers than negative coping have a low level of distress with a Mean Positive Coping (P-COPE )of 6.93 ± 0.41, Mean of Negative Coping (N-COPE) 0.486 ± 1.023. In religious practice, caregivers mostly participate in Organized Reliogious Activities (ORA) or some Non-Organized Reliogious Activities (NORA) with a Mean ORA of 4.20 ± 1.27, and NORA Mean of 4.17 ± 1.37 used by the caregivers. Coping methods were related to Caregiver psychological distress (GHQ-12 and P-COPE co-relation scores are (ρ −0.022, p b 0.05); GHQ-12 scores and N-COPE (ρ + 0.221=, p b 0.001). There is a negative correlation between GHQ 12 and PCOPE, while GHQ12 is positively correlated with NCOPE. Conclusion: According to this study, there is a significant association between religious coping methods, religious practice, and psychological distress among caregivers of children with traumatic brain injury.
“…The perspective of siblings, when one experiences TBI, is recognised in the literature as an area that requires more attention. A systematic review of the literature (Ownsworth & Karlsson, 2020) summarised the results of 11 cross-sectional studies and concluded that their mood and anxiety levels varied more than the control group. Furthermore, the posebno ako su kod ozlijeđene osobe primjetne smetnje u ponašanju i ukoliko nema osiguranu adekvatnu društvenu potporu (Ownsworth i Karlsson, 2020).…”
Section: Main (Superordinate) Themementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jedan sudionik je naveo zabrinutost za svog člana obitelji jer zbog narušene orijentiranosti i stanja konfuzije uslijed ozljede mozga nije znao gdje se nalazi i što se zapravo oko njega zbiva, a oprema psychosocial functioning of siblings was similar to other family members, although they were not the primary caregivers. In conclusion, Ownsworth & Karlsson (2020) emphasised the need to support siblings, especially if the family member with TBI experienced behavioural changes and there was no appropriate social support.…”
Uključenost obitelji u proces rehabilitacije osoba s ozljedom mozga iznimno je važna, no zbog prevencije širenja zaraze virusom SarsCov19 onemogućeni su posjeti i boravak uz bližnju oboljelu osobu u zdravstvenim ustanovama. Cilj je ovog istraživanja steći uvid u iskustvo članova obitelji kojima je bližnji boravio na bolničkoj rehabilitaciji zbog posljedica ozljede mozga u vrijeme pandemije, a kojima je omogućena komunikacija putem virtualne platforme Zoom. Namjeran uzorak sudionika uključuje 11 članova obitelji koji su imali kontinuiranu interakciju sa svojim bližnjim putem videoveze, koja je bila dio radnoterapijske intervencije. U ovom kvalitativnom istraživačkom nacrtu prikupljanje podataka provedeno je putem polustrukturiranog intervjua, a dva su neovisna istraživača provela tematsku analizu kojom su izdvojene tri glavne teme: (1) Suočavanje s traumatskom ozljedom člana obitelji, (2) Iskustvo omogućenog videopoziva tijekom rehabilitacije i (3) Čimbenici obiteljske otpornosti. Rezultati istraživanja upućuju na snažne emocionalne reakcije sudionika i promjene u njihovu svakodnevnom životu uslijed traumatskog događaja i nemogućnosti boravka uz ozlijeđenog člana u bolnici. Iskustvo interakcije putem video veze pokazalo se posebno značajnim za sudionike jer im je omogućilo uvid u zdravstveno stanje bližnjeg, uključenost u rehabilitacijski proces, kao i praćenje oporavka bližnjeg. Sve su to čimbenici koji su pridonijeli otpornosti članova obitelji. Istraživanje ukazuje i na perspektivu primjene virtualnih metoda komunikacije i uključivanja članova obitelji u proces skrbi i rehabilitacije i izvan pandemijskog konteksta, u drugim okolnostima u kojima članovi obitelji ne mogu fizički boraviti uz svojeg bližnjeg u bolnici.
“…With this background, we systematically reviewed studies which explored the psychosocial stressors of SOPEP. Psychosocial stressors were defined as perceived personal and social resources, including appraisals of care demands, coping styles and social support (Ownsworth & Karlsson, 2022).…”
ObjectivesThis study aimed to synthesise the psychosocial stressors of siblings of people with experiences of psychosis (SOPEP). Understanding the specific needs of siblings across diverse cultures would help mental health services to provide culturally specific psychosocial family and sibling‐centred support. This may result in improved relationships between families, better psychosocial well‐being for siblings and better outcomes for patients.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted to explore the psychosocial stressors of SOPEP. Six databases were utilised to identify literature using qualitative methodology.ResultsTwenty‐two studies were included that investigated the Psychosocial Stressors of SOPEP. SOPEP's experiences were influenced by various stages: individual factors, social factors, physical and macro‐level environments. Six key components contributed to SOPEP's psychosocial stressors and facilitated or hindered their intentions, behaviours and experiences of caregiving. These were the SOPEP's beliefs about psychosis, caregiving beliefs, family and cultural values, personality traits, pragmatic challenges and access to resources.ConclusionsGlobally, SOPEP and families may benefit from their involvement in family interventions and individual support that facilitates caregiving and acknowledges their responsibilities, resources, psychosocial needs and emotional experiences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.