A systematic review of IoT communication strategies for an efficient smart environment

Souri, Alireza; Hussien, Aseel; Hoseyninezhad, Mahdi; Norouzi, Monire

doi:10.1002/ett.3736

Cited by 97 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 80 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Resource constrained nature of IoT devices is encouraging lightweight approaches to maintain the transmission efficiency in a satisfactory level [2,52]. Moreover, it will improve the operating time of the battery operated devices [138]. Thus, embedding a proper authentication protocol through circumspect designing is vital on both security and transmission perspective.…”

Section: • Device Authenticationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Security Considerations for Internet of Things: A Survey

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interconnecting "things" and devices that takes the form of wearables, sensors, actuators, mobiles, computers, meters, or even vehicles is a critical requirement for the current era. These inter-networked connections are serving the emerging applications home and building automation, smart cities and infrastructure, smart industries, and smart-everything. However, the security of these connected Internet of things (IoT) plays a centric role with no margin for error. After a review of the relevant, online literature on the topic and after looking at the market trends and developments, one can notice that there are still concerns with regard to security in IoT products and services. This paper is focusing on a survey on IoT security and aims to highlight the most significant problems related to safety and security in the IoT ecosystems. This survey identifies the general threat and attack vectors against IoT devices while highlighting the flaws and weak points that can lead to breaching the security. Furthermore, this paper presents solutions for remediation of the compromised security, as well as methods for risk mitigation, with prevention and improvement suggestions.

show abstract

Section: • Device Authenticationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Security Considerations for Internet of Things: A Survey

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several studies introduced and discussed a specific modern technique using recent technologies such as AI and its challenges at a particular stage of mining (Ghasemi et al, 2014;Muduli et al, 2018;Ghaychi Afrouz and Westman, 2018;Chakravorty, 2019;Hyder et al, 2019;McGaughey, 2020). Few studies also specifically introduced IoT for a single task in mining such tailing dam monitoring (Sun et al, 2012), coal mine monitoring system (Hu et al, 2013;Bo et al, 2014;Zhou et al, 2017), positioning systems in coal mines (Liu et al, 2010;Liu and Liu, 2014), ventilation and gas monitoring (Qin et al, 2011;Qian et al, 2016;Gillies et al, 2004;Jo and Khan, 2018), roof support (Singh et al, 2018), maintenance and machinery safety (Atkins et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2014;McNinch et al, 2019). Hyder et al (2019) investigated the application of modern techniques in automation of mining industry; nevertheless, the challenges of applications of IoT are not evaluated in the literature.…”

Section: Cloud Application Layer Visualizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…IoT use can be categorized into two segments: Industry-specific services such as sensors in a real-time healthcare devices (Woo et al, 2018), building blocks (Kumar and Mallick, 2018;Mijić and Varga, 2018;Almeida et al, 2019a), smart tracking (Song et al, 2019;Anandhi et al, 2019), smart manufacturing (Ezell 2016;Yang et al, 2019) and IoT products that can be used in all sectors, such as smart environment (Jaykumar and Blessy 2014;Arridha et al, 2017;Souri et al, 2019) smart energy (Fensel et al, 2017;Vishwakarma et al, 2019;Sittón-Candanedo et al, 2019;Nižetić et al, 2019) risk management (Hiromoto et al, 2017;Malik and Singh, 2019;Radanliev et al, 2019), security (Naik and Maral, 2017;Khan and Salah, 2018) and IoT analytics (Markkanen, 2015;Patel et al, 2017;Banerjee et al, 2018).…”

Section: Internet Of Things (Iot)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Presently, it is possible to look across all different areas in a mine with IoT and people can identify patterns from seemingly unrelated variables (Yinghua et al, 2012;Khan et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2012;Dong et al, 2017;Behr et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2017). The Internet of Things is speeding up the pace of feedback by delivering ultra-short-term interval controls, which means that people can look at things as they are happening and not after the fact (Atkins et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2014;Thomas and Rad, 2018).…”

Section: Application Of Iot In the Mining Industrymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Comprehensive Review on Internet of Things (IoT) and its Implications in the Mining Industry

Molaei

Rahimi

Siavoshi

et al. 2020

American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The integration of computer-based technologies interacting with industrial machines or home appliances through an interconnected network, for teleoperation, workflow control, switching to autonomous mode, or collecting data automatically using a variety of sensors, is known as Internet of Things (IoT). When applied inside an industrial context, it is possible to immediately benefit from the analytics obtained, contributing to process optimization, machine health, the safety of workers and asset management. IoT can assist real-time platforms in remotely monitoring and operating a complex production system with minimal intervention of humans. Hence it can be beneficial for hazardous industries, such as mining, by increasing the safety of personnel and equipment while reducing operation costs. An ideal smart automated mine could potentially be achievable by gradually taking advantage of IoT. Currently, different sensors are used in mine-related activities, such as geophones in exploration and blast control, piezometers in dewatering and toxic gas detectors in working frontlines. However, a fully integrated automated system is challenging in practice due to infrastructural limitations in communication, data management and storage. Moreover, the tendency of mining companies to continue with traditional methods instead of relying on untested novel techniques decelerates this progress. In this study, the adaptability of the mining industry to IoT systems and its current development is reviewed. Significant challenges of this progress are investigated and recommendations to develop a comprehensive model suited for different mining sections such as exploration, operation and safety considering flexible technologies such as Wireless Sensor Networks and the introduction of Global Data Management.

show abstract

“…Figure 2A depicts the traditional distributed BS (D‐BS) architecture for C‐IoT communication. The traditional D‐BS platform is neither scalable nor flexible 5,6 . However, the next‐generation C‐IoT networks demand a scalable and energy‐efficient BS architecture.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring power consumption reduction in centralized radio access for energy‐efficient centralized‐Internet of Things implementation

Mahapatra

Turuk

Patra

2020

Trans Emerging Tel Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The advent of new wireless and Internet of Things (IoT) technology has increased the dependency on the cellular base stations (BS). The rapid growth in IoT and wireless devices impinges many challenges on cellular services providers and manufacturers. The Centralized Radio Access Network is an energy and cost-efficient solution for the next-generation BS architecture. In this article, we have proposed a centralized-IoT (C-IoT) architecture based on centralized BS (C-BS). We evaluated different base station technologies and compared the C-BS with the traditional distributed BS (D-BS) architecture for power consumption. A mathematical model for power consumption for both types of BS is proposed. We have analyzed the impact of variation in traffic load on power consumption for both types of BS architecture. The simulation result shows that C-BS architecture has the potential to save around 40% to 50% energy compared with D-BS architecture.

show abstract

A systematic review of IoT communication strategies for an efficient smart environment

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Cited by 97 publications

References 80 publications

Security Considerations for Internet of Things: A Survey

Security Considerations for Internet of Things: A Survey

A Comprehensive Review on Internet of Things (IoT) and its Implications in the Mining Industry

Exploring power consumption reduction in centralized radio access for energy‐efficient centralized‐Internet of Things implementation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About