2014
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.872435
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sustainable Business Model for Public Service Organizations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a novel conceptual combination of the public administration and management and the service perspectives has the potential to further our understanding of the nature, process and limitations of the co-production of public services. This process has already begun -both in general terms, through the positing of a public servicedominant logic for public services (Osborne et al , 2014(Osborne et al , 2015 and through the use of this logic to explore co-production (Osborne & Strokosch 2013, Radnor et al 2014, Hardyman et al 2015. This present paper offers a contribution to this debate by addressing the central theoretical issue of the conceptualisation of co-production and its relationship to the co-creation of public value.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, a novel conceptual combination of the public administration and management and the service perspectives has the potential to further our understanding of the nature, process and limitations of the co-production of public services. This process has already begun -both in general terms, through the positing of a public servicedominant logic for public services (Osborne et al , 2014(Osborne et al , 2015 and through the use of this logic to explore co-production (Osborne & Strokosch 2013, Radnor et al 2014, Hardyman et al 2015. This present paper offers a contribution to this debate by addressing the central theoretical issue of the conceptualisation of co-production and its relationship to the co-creation of public value.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter alia, it is articulated as a valuable route to public service reform (Boyle & Harris 2009, Nambisan & Nambisan 2013 and to the planning and delivery of effective public services (Durose et al 2013), a response to the democratic deficit (Pestoff 2006) and a route to active citizenship (DoH 2010) and active communities (Scottish Community Development Centre 2011), and as a means by which to lever in additional resources to public services delivery (Birmingham City Council 2014). A significant body of research has also begun to mature (inter alia Cepiku & Giordano 2014, Fledderus et al 2014, Radnor et al 2014, van Eijk & Steen 2014, Hardyman et al 2015, Isett & Miranda 2015, Wiewiora et al 2015, Despite these varied roles and growing body of empirical research, coproduction continues to be poorly formulated and has become one of a series of 'woolly-words' in public policy. This paper presents a conceptualisation of coproduction that is theoretically rooted in both public management and service management theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in terms of social services, presenting complex structure and diversified goals, NPM can, apart from positive economic effects, result in adverse social consequences [22]. The disappointment in NPM effects is also expressed by the great supporters of this stream [23].…”
Section: Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coproduction as source of effective performance and innovation in public services helps both social inclusion and citizen engagement. Public services are complex service systems employing human, organizational and technical elements and processes (Osborne, Radnor, Vidal & Kinder, 2014). Co-production should be considered as cooperative and voluntary relationship (Brudney & England, 1983) in which citizens behave as active co-producers of services they receive in order to create public value for society within community valorizing the social exchange perspective on the relationship between citizen and government (Alford, 2002).…”
Section: Sustaining Co-production Of Public Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%