2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00293.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sustainable approach to planning housing and social care: if not now, when?

Abstract: The publication of Supporting People (Department of Social Security 1998) has given urgency to discussions around needs analysis, planning, user voice and the development of 'normal' housing for people with support needs. This paper explores a project, which aimed to design a collaborative model for identifying supported housing needs. We provide an overview of the research background, local imperatives and findings, and point to the probability of increasing conflict between the policy of developing 'sustaina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Housing is a complex area which few professionals outside of housing understand, highlighting the criticism of Bochel et al (1999) that ‘despite housing being the foundation of community care, translating and operationalising this was problematic’. A point reinforced by the observation of Foord and Simic (2001: 171) that ‘the cognitive and cultural gap between housing and social workers across the divide was apparent to all researchers’. Findings echoed by this study.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Housing is a complex area which few professionals outside of housing understand, highlighting the criticism of Bochel et al (1999) that ‘despite housing being the foundation of community care, translating and operationalising this was problematic’. A point reinforced by the observation of Foord and Simic (2001: 171) that ‘the cognitive and cultural gap between housing and social workers across the divide was apparent to all researchers’. Findings echoed by this study.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The programme aimed to facilitate independent living in the community for groups that require lowintensity support and also for those that are socially excluded (unable to participate in normal relationships and activities available to the majority) (Levitas et al 2007). Supporting People became the main source of funding for housing support services in England as part of the government's broader strategy to maximise social inclusion while at the same time reshaping services around the needs of individuals who use them (Foord & Simic 2001). While critics of New Labour's homelessness policy have noted its paternalistic and interventionist approach, the Supporting People programme is credited with saving more than £3.4b of public money by supporting individuals to live independently thus avoiding the costs associated with institutionalisation and as such contributing to a 'vastly improved' landscape of provision for homeless people (Whiteford 2013, p. 27).…”
Section: The Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Supporting People programme builds on the ethos of housing support highlighting its significance as part of the government's broader strategy to maximize social inclusion whilst at the same time modernizing and reshaping services around the needs of individuals who use them (Foord & Simic, 2001). The programme was launched in England in 2003 and is aimed at groups that require low intensity support and also those that are socially excluded, at risk or hard to reach through existing service provision (Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions [DETR], 1998).…”
Section: The Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%