Abstract:In English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) context, critical literacy as an alternative approach to teaching language and literature may be considered as something new, compared to its origin in some English-speaking countries such as Australia or the USA. Teachers wishing to adopt critical literacy stance in their class are often left with little knowledge or experience on what critical literacy is and how to develop this approach in their class. This article discusses the result of a survey involving twenty one … Show more
“…However, before promoting the importance of applying critical literacy to students, it is better to know the extent of the teachers" beliefs and knowledge of the critical literacy itself. In line with this, Gustine (2018) found that the majority of teachers still confused with what critical literacy is and how to create and a critical classroom. Whereas, the fact is in conducting a critical-oriented class, the starting point is the teacher should become critically literate to open space for students to be critical (McDaniel, 2006;McLaughlin & Allen, 2002;Riley, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Related to teacher knowledge, they considered that their knowledge of critical literacy was very lack and it might have an impact on the teaching and learning process. In line with this, Gustine (2018) argues that English language teachers still have few knowledges about what critical literacy is and how to apply it in English classes. Whereas, in an effort to apply critical literacy in the classroom, it is teachers who become the starting point for the successful implementation of critical literacy itself, since teachers can help students to become critical readers and provide space for students to develop their critical abilities (McDaniel, 2006).…”
Section: The Teachers' Expectation In An Effort To Develop Criticamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The lack of research on critical literacy in EFL settings has mostly been linked to lack of teacher confidence in student capacity and teachers' knowledge of critical literacy Gustine (2018). In contrast, this research is expected to enrich the collection of literature on teachers' beliefs and knowledge of critical literacy in EFL context and discovering teachers' expectation in an effort to develop critical literacy-oriented classroom.…”
Section: Critical Literacy In Efl Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, the fact is in conducting a critical-oriented class, the starting point is the teacher should become critically literate to open space for students to be critical (McDaniel, 2006;McLaughlin & Allen, 2002;Riley, 2015). Moreover, most of critical literacy researches were carried out in ESL classrooms (Zhang, 2015), only a few researches were done in the EFL context (Gustine, 2013(Gustine, , 2018Ko, 2010), especially in Indonesia (Huang, 2011). In addition, Ko (2010) found that in some Asian country, the knowledge of critical literacy is still lacking.…”
In Indonesia, alternative approaches to language and literature teaching that involve critical literacy tend to be regarded as something new. Teachers who want to apply critical literacy, mostly have limited knowledge or experience of what critical literacy is and how to apply it in their classrooms. This study involved fifteen English teachers in primary schools, secondary schools, and universities in Garut, West Java province, Indonesia, who were surveyed related to their belief and knowledge of critical literacy. The results of an open-ended questionnaire followed by an interview revealed that, although these teachers have been teaching English for about one to sixteen years at various levels and schools, some of them showed a lack of knowledge about critical literacy as a methodological approach to teaching English since they have not been able to distinguish between critical literacy and critical thinking. However, all teachers have a strong belief that critical literacy is important to be applied in teaching and learning practices in order to improve students' ability to understand text. In addition, the study also provides English teachers' expectation in how they can develop a critical literacy-oriented classrooms.
“…However, before promoting the importance of applying critical literacy to students, it is better to know the extent of the teachers" beliefs and knowledge of the critical literacy itself. In line with this, Gustine (2018) found that the majority of teachers still confused with what critical literacy is and how to create and a critical classroom. Whereas, the fact is in conducting a critical-oriented class, the starting point is the teacher should become critically literate to open space for students to be critical (McDaniel, 2006;McLaughlin & Allen, 2002;Riley, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Related to teacher knowledge, they considered that their knowledge of critical literacy was very lack and it might have an impact on the teaching and learning process. In line with this, Gustine (2018) argues that English language teachers still have few knowledges about what critical literacy is and how to apply it in English classes. Whereas, in an effort to apply critical literacy in the classroom, it is teachers who become the starting point for the successful implementation of critical literacy itself, since teachers can help students to become critical readers and provide space for students to develop their critical abilities (McDaniel, 2006).…”
Section: The Teachers' Expectation In An Effort To Develop Criticamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The lack of research on critical literacy in EFL settings has mostly been linked to lack of teacher confidence in student capacity and teachers' knowledge of critical literacy Gustine (2018). In contrast, this research is expected to enrich the collection of literature on teachers' beliefs and knowledge of critical literacy in EFL context and discovering teachers' expectation in an effort to develop critical literacy-oriented classroom.…”
Section: Critical Literacy In Efl Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, the fact is in conducting a critical-oriented class, the starting point is the teacher should become critically literate to open space for students to be critical (McDaniel, 2006;McLaughlin & Allen, 2002;Riley, 2015). Moreover, most of critical literacy researches were carried out in ESL classrooms (Zhang, 2015), only a few researches were done in the EFL context (Gustine, 2013(Gustine, , 2018Ko, 2010), especially in Indonesia (Huang, 2011). In addition, Ko (2010) found that in some Asian country, the knowledge of critical literacy is still lacking.…”
In Indonesia, alternative approaches to language and literature teaching that involve critical literacy tend to be regarded as something new. Teachers who want to apply critical literacy, mostly have limited knowledge or experience of what critical literacy is and how to apply it in their classrooms. This study involved fifteen English teachers in primary schools, secondary schools, and universities in Garut, West Java province, Indonesia, who were surveyed related to their belief and knowledge of critical literacy. The results of an open-ended questionnaire followed by an interview revealed that, although these teachers have been teaching English for about one to sixteen years at various levels and schools, some of them showed a lack of knowledge about critical literacy as a methodological approach to teaching English since they have not been able to distinguish between critical literacy and critical thinking. However, all teachers have a strong belief that critical literacy is important to be applied in teaching and learning practices in order to improve students' ability to understand text. In addition, the study also provides English teachers' expectation in how they can develop a critical literacy-oriented classrooms.
“…The school literacy movement is one of the efforts undertaken by the Indonesian government at this time, in addition to replacing the existing curriculum in schools. The Government of Indonesia through the Ministry of Education and Culture Regulations applies a movement in the form of school literacy which is carried out 15 minutes before lessons are conducted in class at the beginning of learning (Damaianti & Mulyati, 2017;Gustine, 2018). It is hoped that through the school literacy movement it can improve the quality of Indonesia by increasing students' interest in reading at school.…”
This study aims to describe the evaluation of the implementation of the School Literacy Movement in Elementary Schools in the Regency and City of Tangerang. The approach used in this research is a qualitative approach with descriptive evaluation methods. The Context Input Process and Product model as a model used in this evaluation study consist of four stages, namely context, input, process, and product. Data collection techniques used by researchers in this study were interviews, observation, and documentation. The results of the context implementation evaluation indicate that the reasons underlying the implementation of the School Literacy Movement in 6 schools are because of the lack of interest in reading students, the need for varied reading material or references and the availability of supporting facilities for the program. The results of the input evaluation are that the school implements several strategies that can be done to achieve the School Literacy Movement, the adequacy of facilities and infrastructure, have guidelines or Standard Operating Procedures, the implementation of the program is carried out at the beginning of teaching and learning activities or includes in the process of teaching and learning activities, the allocation of funds using independent funds schools or funds from the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget or School Operational Assistance.
The current case study investigated how teacher‐learners (TLs) in an Indonesia‐based undergraduate English language teacher education program learned to apply critical pedagogy (CP) when co‐constructing a critical English language teaching (ELT) curriculum with English language learners (ELLs). CP insights into ELT and second language teacher education are synthesized as a theoretical framework to shed light on how the TLs co‐constructed the critical curriculum. This qualitative research study triangulated data collected from (1) audio‐recorded dialogues between three TLs and their teacher educator (TE) in multiweek classes, (2) video‐recorded teaching sessions when TLs taught ELLs from Papua, and (3) curricular documents and the TLs' reflections submitted on a learning management system. The findings suggest that TLs could raise their critical awareness of (un)fairness or inequalities experienced by ELLs while co‐constructing components of a critical ELT curriculum (i.e., needs analysis, learning objectives, syllabus design, materials development, and lesson planning). TLs' critical consciousness emerged when practicing dialogues with ELLs. Ultimately, reflexivity allowed TLs and their TE to envision improvements of the critical ELT curriculum.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.