2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-011-0840-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of visual sensor network platforms

Abstract: Recent developments in low-cost CMOS cameras have created the opportunity of bringing imaging capabilities to sensor networks. Various visual sensor platforms have been developed with the aim of integrating visual data to wireless sensor applications. The objective of this article is to survey current visual sensor platforms according to in-network processing and compression/coding techniques together with their targeted applications. Characteristics of these platforms such as level of integration, data proces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A. Mannasim -Network Simulator (NS-2) [Simulator I] The NS-2 is one of the most famous network simulators widely used in many researches. The NS-2 covers almost all of the IP protocols, but does not support all of the features needed to simulate a WSN [15], [16]. Specifically, the WSNs' characteristics that can be simulated by the NS-2 simulator are the following [15]- [17]:…”
Section: Simulator Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A. Mannasim -Network Simulator (NS-2) [Simulator I] The NS-2 is one of the most famous network simulators widely used in many researches. The NS-2 covers almost all of the IP protocols, but does not support all of the features needed to simulate a WSN [15], [16]. Specifically, the WSNs' characteristics that can be simulated by the NS-2 simulator are the following [15]- [17]:…”
Section: Simulator Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main features that Mannasim supports, and will be used as initial approach in this research work in order to develop different sensor node types, are the following [19], [20]:  Energy consumption for sensing and processing Another notorious simulator is OMNeT++ [15]- [17], [19] which simulates wired and wireless network. The components that uses are based on C++, although models use high-level language called NED1 (NEtwork Description language).…”
Section:  Energy Consumption Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, in WMSN platform designs [25], [26], [27], [28] these two limitations are viewed as a competing for a fixed energy budget (e.g., energy per video frame). Channel errors are compensated for by increasing the transmission power.…”
Section: • Predictive Encoding Of Video Increases the Impact Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the high-end, web-cams can capture high-resolution video at full frame rate while consuming 200mW, whereas Pan-Tilt-Zoom cameras are re-targetable sensors that produce high quality video while consuming 1W. It is noticeable that the mentioned power amounts are the power consumed by the camera sensors without considering the power consumed by the host motes, see (Tavli et al, 2011) for a survey of visual network platforms. On the other hand, given the large amount of data generated by the multimedia nodes, both processing and transmitting image data are quite costly in terms of energy, much more so than for other types of sensor networks.…”
Section: Multimedia Sensing Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption of fixed lenses is based on the current WMSN platforms (Tavli et al, 2011). Almost all of them (SensEye, MicrelEye, CITRIC, Panoptes, Meerkats) (Kulkarni et al, 2005;Kerhat et al, 2007;Chen et al, 2008;Feng et al, 2005;Margi et al, 2006) have fixed lenses and only high powered PTZ cameras have movement capabilities.…”
Section: Preliminarymentioning
confidence: 99%