2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccve.2014.7297637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia

Abstract: This survey examined public opinion regarding connected-vehicle technology across three large English-speaking countries-the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. The survey yielded useable responses from 1,596 persons over the age of 18. The main results were as follows:The majority of respondents had not previously heard of connected-vehicle technology; however, most had a positive initial opinion of the technology.The majority felt that the expected benefits presented in the survey are likely to occur. Respondents… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
331
4
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 429 publications
(444 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
19
331
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This depicts the psychology of user's that they want to have some sort of control (level 2 and 3) in their hands rather than totally relying on automation (such as in level 4). Similar kind of results were found in the study conducted in developed countries [13] where people were more concerned about using level 4 as compared to level 3. Regarding the reliability of self-driving vehicle technology, 60 % respondents think that this technology would be moderately reliable and 16 % think it would be very reliable.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This depicts the psychology of user's that they want to have some sort of control (level 2 and 3) in their hands rather than totally relying on automation (such as in level 4). Similar kind of results were found in the study conducted in developed countries [13] where people were more concerned about using level 4 as compared to level 3. Regarding the reliability of self-driving vehicle technology, 60 % respondents think that this technology would be moderately reliable and 16 % think it would be very reliable.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The benefits of autonomous vehicles are well-stated: they offer the potential to save valuable time normally spent driving, provide a dramatically safer passenger experience, and are accessible to people who cannot drive [2]. However, surveys of the public perception of autonomous vehicles have revealed both positivity and concerns about safety, legal liability, and interactions with pedestrians and cyclists, among others [11,27]. While much of the research emphasis thus far is on the technological challenges associated with autonomous driving (such as motion planning, localization, perception, and control), a relatively less explored domain is autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interaction [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the development of ITSs, studying how to collect the traffic information efficiently is a really important topic. The case studies of cooperative intelligent transportation systems (C-ITS) [2,3] and connected-vehicle technology [4] developed real-time traffic information collection methods and evaluated traffic status. Furthermore,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, many intelligent transportation systems (ITSs) and services have been designed and developed by several enterprises [1][2][3][4]. For the development of ITSs, studying how to collect the traffic information efficiently is a really important topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%