2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2179-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey instrument to isolate effectiveness of a novel risk communication intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study participants were parents, teachers, and other community members of the local school. A 25-item survey instrument, the earthquake-resistant construction knowledge and opinions (EKO) scale (Sanquini, 2014;Sanquini et al, 2016) was created to test the impact of this film on the following four factors: knowledge of earthquake-resistant construction design, materials, and methods; confidence in efficacy of such construction items; intention to support such construction; and intention to recommend building earthquake-resistant homes to others. When compared to those who saw a control film on an unrelated topic, participants who saw the intervention film statistically significantly increased their pretest-posttest scores on all four factors.…”
Section: Resulting Film Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study participants were parents, teachers, and other community members of the local school. A 25-item survey instrument, the earthquake-resistant construction knowledge and opinions (EKO) scale (Sanquini, 2014;Sanquini et al, 2016) was created to test the impact of this film on the following four factors: knowledge of earthquake-resistant construction design, materials, and methods; confidence in efficacy of such construction items; intention to support such construction; and intention to recommend building earthquake-resistant homes to others. When compared to those who saw a control film on an unrelated topic, participants who saw the intervention film statistically significantly increased their pretest-posttest scores on all four factors.…”
Section: Resulting Film Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meant we purposely avoided including new or archival footage which was potentially upsetting (including actual footage of volcanic phenomenon 'in-action'). While some evidence suggests fear-based stories or appeals may be useful to persuade behaviour change around certain health risks (Witte and Allen 2000), for other risks this approach has the potential to demotivate, generate fatalistic thoughts, or even inadvertently trigger maladaptive behaviour (Witte and Allen 2000, Witte 1992, Sanquini et al 2016b. Ethical considerations such as this were discussed and built into the design at the outset, and reassessed throughout the lifecourse of the project.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognised benefits include the ability to convey information or processes that perhaps are hard to envision or understand, to influence risk perceptions, to increase trust, to motivate behaviour change, and to maintain social memory of particular events (Waterson 2007, Ferreira 2004). However, despite success in other disciplines (e.g., Lowe et al 2006), there is very limited evidence from geophysical hazards research as to the role of film in intervention strategies aimed at reducing risk to environmental threats (as an exception see Wood 2016b, Sanquini, Thapaliya andWood 2016a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preventive information is also provided through other means but we chose to focus on DICRIM because it is the main regulatory tool of compulsory form dedicated to the general public that 5 summarizes all risks and their prevention. A brochure, film or advertisement may be just one part of a larger campaign to promote hazard readiness, and these items can and should be tested separately for efficacy and effectiveness prior to broad deployment (Sanquini, Thapaliya, and Wood 2016).…”
Section: Public Meetingsmentioning
confidence: 99%