2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk communication films: Process, product and potential for improving preparedness and behaviour change

Abstract: The medium of film is well established for education and communication about hazardous phenomena as it provides engaging ways to directly view hazards and their impacts. Empirical analysis can help to understand films' effectiveness in informing populations at risk and catalysing action to reduce risk.Using volcanic eruptions as a focus, an evidence-based methodology was devised to create, use, and track the outcomes of digital film tools designed to raise hazard and risk awareness, and develop preparedness ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protective action perceptions, which refers to the perception level of individuals on taking response actions against potential hazards, was selected as the dependent variable [21]. The concept presents a comprehensive reflection of individual psychological factors and ability factors [22]. To be more specific, the psychological factors refer to the level of trust in sources of advice on relevant protective actions and professional evaluation; the ability factors refer to individual risk response knowledge, skills, and resources etc.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protective action perceptions, which refers to the perception level of individuals on taking response actions against potential hazards, was selected as the dependent variable [21]. The concept presents a comprehensive reflection of individual psychological factors and ability factors [22]. To be more specific, the psychological factors refer to the level of trust in sources of advice on relevant protective actions and professional evaluation; the ability factors refer to individual risk response knowledge, skills, and resources etc.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On hearing the word following an earthquake, people move to higher ground (Syafwina, 2014). The 'Strengthening Resilience in Volcanic Areas' (STREVA) project created oral history films to capture community experience of volcanic eruptions in Colombia and St. Vincent and the Grenadines, which proved not only to be a cathartic act for survivors sharing their experiences on film, but also motivated audiences to consider ownership of risk and potential actions to reduce it (Hicks et al, 2017). Similarly in New Zealand, the production of a dance performance assisted the recovery of those that had been affected by the Christchurch earthquake (Egan and Quigley, 2015).…”
Section: Use Of Narratives In Citizen Science For Disaster Risk Reducmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond these examples, narrative could have a number of functions in relation to citizen science more broadly, and not only for DRR: (1) as a data source from which information can be extracted (Stone et al, 2014); (2) as a data object, e.g., for bonding and social connection (social capital) (Chamlee-Wright, 2017); (3) as a tool for communication e.g., storytelling (Hicks et al, 2017); (4) as a resource to challenge dominant narratives; and (5) as a tool to evaluate a project or intervention (Constant and Roberts, 2017).…”
Section: Use Of Narratives In Citizen Science For Disaster Risk Reducmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to better understand volcanic risk in such settings, is to explore measures for risk reduction (whether through planning, communication or education; e.g. Barclay et al , 1998Barclay et al , , 2015Mani et al, 2016;Hicks et al, 2017). Another is to better understand the links between the physical, social and economic impacts of past hazard events; this is the focus of our paper.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%