2013
DOI: 10.1002/jqs.2642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 10Be production‐rate calibration for the Arctic

Abstract: We present a Baffin Bay 10 Be production-rate calibration derived from glacial deposits in western Greenland and Baffin Island, and test our results against published 10 Be calibration datasets to develop an Arctic 10 Be production rate. Our calibration comprises: (i) 10 Be measurements from moraine boulders linked to a 14 Cdated moraine at Jakobshavn Isfjord in western Greenland, (ii) an independent and previously published 10 Be production rate at Jakobshavn Isfjord and (iii) re-measured 10 Be concentration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
231
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(141 reference statements)
11
231
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several recent 10 Be production rate calibration studies have reported 5-15% lower reference 10 Be production rates (e.g. Balco et al, 2009;Young et al, 2013;Heyman, 2014) compared to the original CRONUS production rates (e.g. Balco et al, 2008), implying that many exposure ages are likely to be thousands of years older than previously reported.…”
Section: Cosmogenic Datingmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several recent 10 Be production rate calibration studies have reported 5-15% lower reference 10 Be production rates (e.g. Balco et al, 2009;Young et al, 2013;Heyman, 2014) compared to the original CRONUS production rates (e.g. Balco et al, 2008), implying that many exposure ages are likely to be thousands of years older than previously reported.…”
Section: Cosmogenic Datingmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Several recent studies have focussed on constraining the extent and thickness of extant ice sheets in Greenland (Roberts et al, 2008;Briner et al, 2014;Young et al, 2013) and Antarctica (Stone et al, 2003;Bentley et al, 2010;Mackintosh et al, 2011) since the LGM.…”
Section: Cosmogenic Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the Arctic sea-level 220 high-latitude 10 Be production rate of 3.93 ± 0.15 atoms g -1 yr -1 (Young et al, 2013b). 221…”
Section: Be Exposure Age Calculation 218mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured 10 Be concentrations were used to calculate surface exposure ages using the CRONUS-Earth 10 Be-26 Al exposure age calculator version 2.2 (http://hess.ess.washington.edu), assuming no prior exposure and no erosion during exposure. The calculator provides a variety of production rate calibrations, and we used the Arctic calibration (Young et al, 2013) with a spallation-induced production rate of 3.93 ± 0.15 atoms g -1 a -1 (CRONUS-Earth 2013; Alternate calibration data sets, Wrapper script 2.2, Main calculator 2.1, constants 2.2.1, muons 1.1). This production rate was chosen because the calibration data set extends back to ca.…”
Section: Uncertainties Are Reported At the 1s Level And Include All Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lake Falltjärnen has a threshold level at 160-165 m a.s.l. (Chmeleff et al, 2010;Korschinek et al, 2010), and the Arctic calibration data set (Young et al, 2013 …”
Section: Radiocarbon Agesmentioning
confidence: 99%