1930
DOI: 10.1080/0034408300250702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Summary of the Work of the Character Education Inquiry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Kohlberg and Mayer [1972, p. 479] asserted that "labeling a set of behaviors displayed by a child with positive or negative trait terms does not signify they are of adaptive or ethical importance." Indeed, Kohlberg believed that the situational variation in behaviors observed by Hartshorne and May [1930] was evidence sufficient "to debunk the very notion of character itself" [Power, Higgins, & Kohlberg, 1989, p. 127]. …”
Section: Italics Added] Agrees She Notes Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Kohlberg and Mayer [1972, p. 479] asserted that "labeling a set of behaviors displayed by a child with positive or negative trait terms does not signify they are of adaptive or ethical importance." Indeed, Kohlberg believed that the situational variation in behaviors observed by Hartshorne and May [1930] was evidence sufficient "to debunk the very notion of character itself" [Power, Higgins, & Kohlberg, 1989, p. 127]. …”
Section: Italics Added] Agrees She Notes Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kind of ethical learning that we wish to defend draws upon a theoretical and practical model known as 'the construction of moral personality' . This model has been used for many years in our pre-university education and it brings together ideas from other models that focus on development and moral reasoning (Kohlberg 1981(Kohlberg , 1984Colby & Kohlberg, 1987;Gibbs, 2003), emotion and sensation (Noddings, 2008;Prinz, 2009) and moral character ( Hartshorne & May, 1930;Berkowitz, 2002;Lapsley & Clark, 2005;Carr, 2008;Doris, 2008;Nucci & Narváez, 2008).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, there had been few rigorous assessments of programs fitting our conceptualization of moral education, and the extant research was not promising. In their classic study on character development, Hartshorne and May (1930) concluded that common moral education practices did not work. Even worse, their data convinced them that morality was dictated by situations, not character; therefore, attempting to improve morality by developing children’s character might be an exercise in futility.…”
Section: How Well Does Moral Education Work?mentioning
confidence: 99%