2016
DOI: 10.2112/jcoastres-d-15-00122.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Morphological Characteristics around Artificial Headlands in Kashima Coast, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A horizontal and bright edge extending in the longshore corresponds to the shoreline, which is marked in Figure 3a; the radar position is located at the center of the bottom edge in the figure, indicated by a black oval. The time-averaged images enable the identification of the intertidal bathymetry, breaker zone, rip current, bar crest locations, mega-cusp migrations, wave run-up, and other features [6,26,27,[43][44][45]. Previously, Takewaka [6] examined the accuracy of the intertidal morphological feature using time-averaged images compared to field survey results.…”
Section: X-band Radar System and Time-averaged Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A horizontal and bright edge extending in the longshore corresponds to the shoreline, which is marked in Figure 3a; the radar position is located at the center of the bottom edge in the figure, indicated by a black oval. The time-averaged images enable the identification of the intertidal bathymetry, breaker zone, rip current, bar crest locations, mega-cusp migrations, wave run-up, and other features [6,26,27,[43][44][45]. Previously, Takewaka [6] examined the accuracy of the intertidal morphological feature using time-averaged images compared to field survey results.…”
Section: X-band Radar System and Time-averaged Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-series of individual radar pixel intensities are gathered from hourly time-averaged images across the selected timescale of two weeks, including a full spring-neap cycle (as an example, June [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]2005). Figure 6a displays the cross-shore time stack images within the range between y = 5 m and y = 103 m. The red line marked in Figure 6b indicates the variation of the instantaneous waterline position digitized manually by visual inspection, and Figure 6c is the concurrent tidal records.…”
Section: Intertidal Beach Profile and Shoreline Estimation Using Twm mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More recently, Troselj et al (2018) and Troselj et al (2019) conducted dynamical downscaling of coastal dynamics emphasizing freshwater impact from three major rivers and seasonal variabilities of SST and SSS, respectively. Furthermore, several past studies focused on shoreline variabilities along the Ibaraki Coast Galal, 2007, 2015;Suzuki and Kuriyama, 2014;An, 2016;Banno et al, 2016;Takewaka and Wen, 2017), with some of them dealing with impacts due to the October 2006 storms. Galal and Takewaka (2011) conducted erosion analyzes along the Kashima Coast in Ibaraki for the extreme October 2006 storm from the viewpoint of wave energy flux distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%