2003
DOI: 10.5432/ijshs.1.171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Effectiveness of Flag Football as Teaching Materials in Physical Education Classes: Through Analysis of the Change in Planning and Executing Strategies by Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…); ③Sports programs (Mini-soccer, Mini-basketball, Fun athletic, Soft volleyball, etc. ); ④Functional exercises (Basic movement exercises, Physical fitness exercises) [ 21 , 22 ].Research on rugby has focused on the risk and probability of sports injuries in young children [ 4 , [23] , [24] , [25] ], physical fitness [ [26] , [27] , [28] ], physical and mental health [ 27 ], and tactical strategy execution rate [ 29 ], and there are no empirical studies on flag rugby and the development of gross motor skills in preschoolers for the time being.A.Fisher.et al [ 30 ] concluded that motor-specific skill interventions are more effective in improving young children's gross motor than recreational free play.10 weeks of fun athletic can significantly improve Locomotor subject skills, but insignificant differences for One hand stationary dribble and Kick a stationary ball, fun athletic can effectively promote preschool children's gross motor skills, but showed uneven characteristics of motor gross skills [ 31 ].Mini-basketball activity improved One hand stationary dribble, Underhand throw and Forehand strike of self-bounced in both boys and girls, there was no significant difference in improving Kick a stationary ball [ 32 ].12 weeks of soccer game instruction to promote 5–6 year old in One-handed stationary dribble, Two-handed strike of a stationary ball, and Forehand strike of self-bounce were not significant [ 33 ].After 12 weeks of soft volleyball game instruction, there were significant differences in gross motor skills among 5–6 year old, but non-significant differences in kicking a stationary ball test items [ 34 ].A García.et al [ 10 ] concluded that physical activity facilitates small improvements in lower limb strength and speed agility in preschoolers, and suggesting that physical activity should focus on high intensity on the development of gross motor skills in future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…); ③Sports programs (Mini-soccer, Mini-basketball, Fun athletic, Soft volleyball, etc. ); ④Functional exercises (Basic movement exercises, Physical fitness exercises) [ 21 , 22 ].Research on rugby has focused on the risk and probability of sports injuries in young children [ 4 , [23] , [24] , [25] ], physical fitness [ [26] , [27] , [28] ], physical and mental health [ 27 ], and tactical strategy execution rate [ 29 ], and there are no empirical studies on flag rugby and the development of gross motor skills in preschoolers for the time being.A.Fisher.et al [ 30 ] concluded that motor-specific skill interventions are more effective in improving young children's gross motor than recreational free play.10 weeks of fun athletic can significantly improve Locomotor subject skills, but insignificant differences for One hand stationary dribble and Kick a stationary ball, fun athletic can effectively promote preschool children's gross motor skills, but showed uneven characteristics of motor gross skills [ 31 ].Mini-basketball activity improved One hand stationary dribble, Underhand throw and Forehand strike of self-bounced in both boys and girls, there was no significant difference in improving Kick a stationary ball [ 32 ].12 weeks of soccer game instruction to promote 5–6 year old in One-handed stationary dribble, Two-handed strike of a stationary ball, and Forehand strike of self-bounce were not significant [ 33 ].After 12 weeks of soft volleyball game instruction, there were significant differences in gross motor skills among 5–6 year old, but non-significant differences in kicking a stationary ball test items [ 34 ].A García.et al [ 10 ] concluded that physical activity facilitates small improvements in lower limb strength and speed agility in preschoolers, and suggesting that physical activity should focus on high intensity on the development of gross motor skills in future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, studies on Flag rugby have focused on the risk and probability of sports injuries in adolescent children [4], [34], [35], [36] ,physical fitness [31], [33], [37] ,physical and mental health [33] ,tactical strategy execution rate [38] , and there are no empirical studies on rugby to promote the development of Gross Motor in children for the time being.Antonio García Hermoso et al concluded that physical activity facilitates small improvements in lower limb strength and speed agility in preschool children and suggested that future physical activity should focus on Gross…”
Section: The Relationship Between Flag Rugby Game Sessions and The De...mentioning
confidence: 99%