2018
DOI: 10.1109/jphotov.2018.2870735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Charge Carrier Transport of Passivating Contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5] To reduce the recombination loss, passivating contacts (also referred to as carrier-selective contacts) have been introduced for high-quality passivation with low contact resistance. 2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The passivating contact cells differ from conventional cells in the following ways: (1) the recombination occurring at the metal-semiconductor junction is reduced by a passivation layer between the crystalline silicon and metal contact, and (2) the majority carriers can move to the metal contact, while the minority carriers cannot be moved from crystalline silicon to the metal contact owing to carrier selectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] To reduce the recombination loss, passivating contacts (also referred to as carrier-selective contacts) have been introduced for high-quality passivation with low contact resistance. 2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The passivating contact cells differ from conventional cells in the following ways: (1) the recombination occurring at the metal-semiconductor junction is reduced by a passivation layer between the crystalline silicon and metal contact, and (2) the majority carriers can move to the metal contact, while the minority carriers cannot be moved from crystalline silicon to the metal contact owing to carrier selectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementary Data 1 for tabulated data). 24,58,69,90,101,108,123,[230][231][232][233][234][235][236] b, Comparison of efficiency loss (1-η/ηlim)x100 against development time for heavily doped directly metallised contacts (black) and passivating contact (colored) technologies (data from Fig. 1a).…”
Section: Comparison Of Contacting Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, poly‐Si accounts for free carrier absorption (FCA) in the near infrared (NIR) wavelength range . Therefore, into an attempt to obtain more transparent high‐thermal budget CSPCs, poly‐Si layer has been alloyed with oxygen or carbon and applied in FBC devices in combination with a‐Si:H–based CSPC at the textured front side . Notwithstanding the promising results at both passivation level and cell level, these alloys are still not optically optimal presenting higher absorption coefficient than c‐Si in the visible range and FCA in the NIR range, just like poly‐Si .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Therefore, into an attempt to obtain more transparent high-thermal budget CSPCs, poly-Si layer has been alloyed with oxygen 35,36 or carbon 37 and applied in FBC devices in combination with a-Si:H-based CSPC at the textured front side. 38,39 Notwithstanding the promising results at both passivation level and cell level, these alloys are still not optically optimal 35,40 presenting higher absorption coefficient than c-Si in the visible range and FCA in the NIR range, just like poly-Si. 41 Thus, to minimize these optical losses due to poly-Si layers while keeping high their passivation quality, a careful surface engineering has to be performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%