2017
DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1321124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on the chain ratio-ratio-type exponential estimator for finite population variance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this result, we can conclude that using the ln -function in variance estimators improves the efficiency of the estimators. In the future, the proposed estimator can be extended to a family of estimators, such as in the studies of and Singh et al (2017). Also, different estimators of other sampling methods can be developed using the ln -function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this result, we can conclude that using the ln -function in variance estimators improves the efficiency of the estimators. In the future, the proposed estimator can be extended to a family of estimators, such as in the studies of and Singh et al (2017). Also, different estimators of other sampling methods can be developed using the ln -function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x is known and when 2 y s in (2) is replaced with R t , then Singh et al [21] provided the chain ratio estimator as…”
Section: If the Population Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining (1) and ( 6), Singh's et al [21] estimator provides a lower MSE than the unbiased estimator under the condition 1 C  . From (3) and ( 6), Singh's et al [13] estimator provides a lower MSE than the Isaki's [20] estimator under the condition 1.5 C  .…”
Section: If the Population Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of estimators have been developed in the context of ratio, product and regression estimators for estimating population variance by using the known auxiliary information based on different conventional measures such as mean, median, quartiles, semi-interquartile range, semi-interquartile average, coefficient of skewness, coefficient of kurtosis etc. One can see the work of Isaki [3], Upadhyaya and Singh [4], Kadilar and Cingi [5], Subramani and Kumarapandiyan [6][7][8][9], Khan and Shabbir [10], Hussain and Shabbir [11], Zamanzade and Vock [12], Yaqub and Shabbir [13], Abid, Abbas and Riaz [14], Maqbool and Javaid [15], Adichwal, Sharma and Singh [16], Maji, Singh and Bandyopadhyay [17], Zamanzade and Wang [18], Zamanzade and Mahdizadeh [19], Singh, Pal and Yadav [20], Zamanzade, E and Wang [21], Hussain et al [22], Muneer et al [23], Mahdizadeh and Zamanzade [24], Abid et al [25] and the references cited therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%