2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(01)00503-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the performance of void fraction correlations used in the context of drift-flux two-phase flow models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4, have been found to be 0.0036, 0.029 and 0.029, respectively. The former two parameters are seen to compare quite favourably with the corresponding values of 0.019 and 0.103, respectively, reported in Coddington and Macian 10) for the void fraction range of 0.0 to 1.0. (The larger standard deviation in the latter case (see Fig.…”
Section: Confirmatory Results For Watersupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4, have been found to be 0.0036, 0.029 and 0.029, respectively. The former two parameters are seen to compare quite favourably with the corresponding values of 0.019 and 0.103, respectively, reported in Coddington and Macian 10) for the void fraction range of 0.0 to 1.0. (The larger standard deviation in the latter case (see Fig.…”
Section: Confirmatory Results For Watersupporting
confidence: 69%
“…From the results presented in Table 2 for the loop data, very small values of both the standard deviation and the root-mean-square error are observed for all three formalisms of the relative drift velocity. These values are smaller than the corresponding ones for water, 10) although it needs to be noted that, for the heavy liquid metal analysis, the void fractions have an upper bound of $0:4. In all three cases, the phase distribution parameter C 0 is observed to be less than 1.0.…”
Section: Heavy Liquid Metal Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first 4 sets such as the constitutive equations of Bestion,11) Chexal et al, 12) Inoue et al, 13) and Maier and Coddington 14) have been derived from rod bundle data (mainly differential pressure measurements) and have been successfully tested against different rod bundle databases 16) in a wide range of void fraction conditions. The last set such as the constitutive equations of Hibiki et al 15) was derived for annulus channel geometry and obtained by local probe measurements.…”
Section: Survey Of Existing Work 1 One-dimensional Drift-flux Mmentioning
confidence: 99%