2008
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.45.402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Structure of Subcooled Boiling Water Flow in a Subchannel of 3×3 Rod Bundles

Abstract: In this paper, the interfacial flow structure of subcooled water boiling flow in a subchannel of 3 Â 3 rod bundles is presented. The 9 rods are positioned in a quadrangular assembly with a rod diameter of 8.2 mm and a pitch distance of 16.6 mm. Local void fraction, interfacial area concentration, interfacial velocity, Sauter mean diameter, and liquid velocity have been measured using a conductivity probe and a Pitot tube in 20 locations inside one of the subchannels. A total of 53 flow conditions have been con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective heat removal depends on the complex hydrodynamics of the two‐phase flow around the nuclear rods bundle. The hydrodynamics observed in the nuclear reactor core is complicated owing to the presence of nuclear rods (which is a challenging geometry), and also due to the complex phenomena of bubble nucleation, growth, detachment, and simultaneous motion of bubbles and the liquid phase …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effective heat removal depends on the complex hydrodynamics of the two‐phase flow around the nuclear rods bundle. The hydrodynamics observed in the nuclear reactor core is complicated owing to the presence of nuclear rods (which is a challenging geometry), and also due to the complex phenomena of bubble nucleation, growth, detachment, and simultaneous motion of bubbles and the liquid phase …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations have been self‐imposed by the authors, primarily to take care of optical distortions brought in by the geometry of heater rods; however, that poses an important shortcoming when it comes to scaling up the technology of BWRs. However, only a few of these works have reported liquid phase velocity . Majority of the experimental data reported in the literature are based on invasive measurement techniques, which provide only point measurements, with the further limitation being that the measurements themselves threaten to irreversibly affect the flow itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The void fraction data were collected for the evaluation and improvement of the drift-flux model correlations and pressure drop data were obtained for the assessment and development of two-phase friction multiplier model and two-phase spacer-grid-loss coefficient model in the rod bundle flow channel. Some studies (Yun et al, 2008;Yang et al, 2013;Hosokawa et al, 2014;Ren et al, 2018) have focused on the local measurements of radial void fraction, IAC, and two-phase velocity profiles in the rod bundle flow channel. The obtained radial profile data of the flow parameters were mainly used for the development for two-phase interfacial transfer model, which is required to close the two-fluid model (Ishii, 1975;Ishii and Hibiki, 2010), and the validation of numerical simulations in the rod bundle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the available radial profile database for the local flow parameters are not enough to thoroughly know the whole picture of the flow characteristics and correctly make the constitutive models required for accurate predictions using the two-fluid model in the rod bundle flow channel. The available databases from local measurements, moreover, only consist of the 3×3 rod bundle data of Yun et al (2008), the 4×4 rod bundle data of Hosokawa et al (2014), the 5×5 rod bundle data of Ren et al (2018), and the 8×8 rod bundle data of Yang et al (2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%