A study of morbidity pattern in Misgav Ladach technique of caesearean section

Kshirsagar, Nitin; Sajjan, Kruthika R; Patil, Sanjay Kumar; Nagur, Basavaraj

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161692

Cited by 2 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 4 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 In present study as shown in Table 3 in majority of cases (70.5) skin incision to baby delivery time is 1-2 min and >4.1 minute in only 2% cases. In a comparative study done by Kshirsagar N et al, time taken from skin incision to baby delivery was 1.4 minutes average in Misgav Ladach method and 2.4 min average in traditional method.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 46%

“…In the present series the maximum number of patients who underwent caesarean sections was primigravidae (46.5%) followed by second gravid (38.5%), similar results were obtained by Dilip KCet al and Kshirsagar N et al, but in study of M Stark et al the mean age was 28.9 years in Joel Cohen's group and 29.4 years in pfannensteil's group. [1][2][3] this difference can be explained by the early age of marriage, low education level leads to early conception.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In a comparative study done by Kshirsagar N et al, time taken from skin incision to baby delivery was 1.4 minutes average in Misgav Ladach method and 2.4 min average in traditional method. 1 Corosu R et al in their study used pfannensteil's incision instead of Joel Cohen's incision and average time from skin incision to baby delivery was 4.8 minute. 4 In present study the mean duration of surgery was 26 minute 12 seconds, in study done by Kshirsagar N et al, in majority of the cases in Misgav Ladach group the time taken for surgery was 31-35 min and in traditional method it was 36-40 min.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 This method is concise very simple to perform operation for abdominal delivery of foetus with reduced morbidity and very short operative time. The main features of Misgav Ladach technique of caesarean section are transverse Joen Cohen incision for opening the abdomen, suturing uterine incision in one layer and non-closure of visceral and parietal peritoneum.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…The main features of Misgav Ladach technique of caesarean section are transverse Joen Cohen incision for opening the abdomen, suturing uterine incision in one layer and non-closure of visceral and parietal peritoneum. 1 This is one of the changing trend in caesarean section, thus an attempt was made to evaluate this technique of LSCS in detail regards to technique and patient's benefit.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Clinical study of Misgav Ladach technique of caesarean section

Gadappa

Dixit

Sharma

et al. 2017

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTIONCaesarean section is the commonest major surgical procedure in modern days and situations often demand its performance in the quickest possible operative time for fetal or maternal emergencies without compromising the surgical excellence. In today's world there is a continuous search for better and more satisfactory techniques for caesarean section. This is one of the changing trend in caesarean section, thus an attempt was made to evaluate this technique of LSCS in detail regards to technique and patient's benefit. METHODSIt was prospective surgical interventional study carried out on 200 patients who underwent caesarean section at Government medical college Aurangabad after taking permission from institutional ethical committee.200 cases were randomly selected whose complete blood count, blood grouping was known preoperatively. After taking a through history and complete general and ABSTRACT Background: In the last decades caesarean section rates increased in many countries becoming the most performed intraperitoneal surgical procedure. The operative technique performed is made chiefly on the basis of the individual experience and preference of operators, the characteristics of patients, timing and urgency of intervention. Present study was undertaken to assess the benefits of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section technique in tertiary care hospital and evaluate the operative parameters like efficacy, safety, duration of surgery, blood loss, need for suture material, post-operative morbidity. Methods: Prospective surgical interventional study conducted in department of obstetrics and gynecology in tertiary care institute. Results: The duration of surgery, blood loss and post-operative complications were significantly less in the Misgav Ladach technique of LSCS. Conclusions:The choice of the Caesarean section technique is strictly linked to the individual experience and confidence of the surgical team. Misgav-Ladach technique proved to be associated to less complications, moreover, since its shorter operating time; it is to prefer in all that cases a prompt operation is required.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 46%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Clinical study of Misgav Ladach technique of caesarean section

Gadappa

Dixit

Sharma

et al. 2017

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Caesarean delivery by Misgave ladach technique versus conventional technique: A randomized controlled trial

Singh¹,

Verma²

2019

Int. J. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was designed to compare the Misgave Ladach technique versus conventional technique of caesarian deliveries. Method: This was a prospective study conducted on 160 women undergoing a primary LSCS for various indications. Patients were randomly divided in to two groups of 80 each; group A underwent LSCS by Misgave Ladach technique and group B by conventional method. A per-operative and short term postoperative outcome of both groups were compared. Result: Maternal age, parity, gestational age and indication for caesarean deliveries were similar across groups The operating time, incision delivery interval and post-op pain was significantly reduced in group underwent LSCS by Misgave Ladach method in compare to group who underwent LSCS by conventional technique. Conclusion:Misgave Ladach method may provide a faster technique and cost effective method of LSCS.

show abstract

A study of morbidity pattern in Misgav Ladach technique of caesearean section

Cited by 2 publications

References 4 publications

Clinical study of Misgav Ladach technique of caesarean section

Clinical study of Misgav Ladach technique of caesarean section

Caesarean delivery by Misgave ladach technique versus conventional technique: A randomized controlled trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About