A study of argumentation-based negotiation in collaborative design

Jin, Yan; Geslin, Mathieu

doi:10.1017/s0890060409990151

Cited by 14 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, the chain of reasoning should be traceable and explicated. Argumentation-based approaches aim to integrate these reasons into reports (Jin & Geslin, 2010;Karacapilidis & Papadias, 2001). Only HISinOne supports the tractability of causes by integrating essential reasons that led to a specific component.…”

Section: Argumentation-based Adaption (Vi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Leveraging Sustainability Reporting in Higher Education Institutions—A Multidimensional Research Agenda

Schoormann

Buhrig²,

Behrens³

et al. 2017

IJHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainability has become increasingly important to research and practice. In order to determine impacts, identify improvement potential and to disclose efforts towards sustainability, an organization needs appropriate reporting. Thus, sustainability reporting has become a topic of broader interest, for example, to assess own situations, enable benchmarking, communicate own efforts and improve trust. Although sustainability reporting is a complex issue, only limited research and guidelines for higher education institutions (HEI) are available. Accordingly, negative impacts occur such as regarding the standardization and, thus, the comparability of reports. This article describes and demonstrates how different approaches from research related to reporting (information systems research in particular) and sustainability can be transferred to the field of sustainability reporting in HEIs to leverage the applicability of such reports. As a result, classifications of existing indicators and methodical approaches are provided, which are based on the analysis of a campus management system and different reporting standards as well as reporting knowledge in general. These classifications indicate that financial aspects are often focused and environmental issues are neglected. Moreover, the findings emphasize the importance of further multidimensional research on different topics such as (re-)development of specific indicators for HEIs, (re-)design of campus management systems and extension of current reporting standards. Therfore, a research agenda-with 18 agenda items-that synthesizes the presented directions is proposed. This agenda can be used to position further research or to derive new and innovative research questions.

show abstract

Section: Argumentation-based Adaption (Vi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Leveraging Sustainability Reporting in Higher Education Institutions—A Multidimensional Research Agenda

Schoormann

Buhrig²,

Behrens³

et al. 2017

IJHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This involves, for example, method engineering approaches [Brinkkemper, 1996;Heym and Österle, 1993;Song and Osterweil, 1992;White Baker, 2011] or meta modeling methods and languages [Dawson and Dawson, 1995;Nissen et al, 1996;Tveit, 2009]. Model generation stands for approaches regarding the construction of conceptual models like argumentation-based modeling approaches [Andrade et al, 2004;Jin and Geslin, 2010;Karacapilidis and Papadias, 2001], or the generation of multi-perspective models [Recker, Rosemann, Indulska and Green, 2009;Rosa, Dumas, Hofstede and Mendling, 2011;Sommerville and Sawyer, 1997]. Aspects, where conceptual models are actually put in use, are subsumed under the category model application.…”

Section: Modeling Aspectmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is equally important for an IS developer or business process designer to know the rationale behind an information systems architecture, a specific program part, or a business process. Argumentation-based modeling is an existing IS approach that enables IS or process designers to integrate the argumentation and reasoning for models or model elements into information models and thereby explicate the rationale behind certain elements of a conceptual model [Andrade et al, 2004;Jin and Geslin, 2010;Karacapilidis and Papadias, 2001].…”

Section: Argumentation-based Modelingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptual Modeling in Law: An Interdisciplinary Research Agenda

Knackstedt¹,

Heddier²,

Becker³

2014

CAIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article describes how different approaches from the IS field of conceptual modeling should be transferred to the legal domain to enhance comprehensibility of legal regulations and contracts. It is further described how this in turn would benefit the IS discipline. The findings emphasize the importance of further interdisciplinary research on that topic. A research agenda that synthesizes the presented ideas is proposed based on a framework that structures the research field. Researchers from both disciplines, IS and Law, that are interested in this field should use the research agenda to position their research and to derive new and innovative research questions.

show abstract

“…Increasing a focus on communication has been shown to deter the tendency to find a quick solution. 8 In this study, consensus was apparent when participants appealed to a larger group understanding (either something they had decided earlier in their group discussions or something the majority of participants in the class were doing) to validate and make design decisions. For example, in the two examples below we see participants in the large group appealing to a previously stated consensus and asking the group to reach consensus.…”

Section: Consensus-building Through Argumentationmentioning

confidence: 88%