2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0890060409990151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of argumentation-based negotiation in collaborative design

Abstract: Engineering of complex systems often involves teamwork. The members of an engineering team must work together to identify design requirements, explore design spaces, generate design alternatives, and make both interactive and joint design decisions. Because of the latency of information and the disciplinary differences, it is often a difficult process for the members of a team to reach agreements when needed. Negotiation has been studied as a method for facilitating information exchange, mutual understanding, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the chain of reasoning should be traceable and explicated. Argumentation-based approaches aim to integrate these reasons into reports (Jin & Geslin, 2010;Karacapilidis & Papadias, 2001). Only HISinOne supports the tractability of causes by integrating essential reasons that led to a specific component.…”
Section: Argumentation-based Adaption (Vi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the chain of reasoning should be traceable and explicated. Argumentation-based approaches aim to integrate these reasons into reports (Jin & Geslin, 2010;Karacapilidis & Papadias, 2001). Only HISinOne supports the tractability of causes by integrating essential reasons that led to a specific component.…”
Section: Argumentation-based Adaption (Vi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involves, for example, method engineering approaches [Brinkkemper, 1996;Heym and Österle, 1993;Song and Osterweil, 1992;White Baker, 2011] or meta modeling methods and languages [Dawson and Dawson, 1995;Nissen et al, 1996;Tveit, 2009]. Model generation stands for approaches regarding the construction of conceptual models like argumentation-based modeling approaches [Andrade et al, 2004;Jin and Geslin, 2010;Karacapilidis and Papadias, 2001], or the generation of multi-perspective models [Recker, Rosemann, Indulska and Green, 2009;Rosa, Dumas, Hofstede and Mendling, 2011;Sommerville and Sawyer, 1997]. Aspects, where conceptual models are actually put in use, are subsumed under the category model application.…”
Section: Modeling Aspectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is equally important for an IS developer or business process designer to know the rationale behind an information systems architecture, a specific program part, or a business process. Argumentation-based modeling is an existing IS approach that enables IS or process designers to integrate the argumentation and reasoning for models or model elements into information models and thereby explicate the rationale behind certain elements of a conceptual model [Andrade et al, 2004;Jin and Geslin, 2010;Karacapilidis and Papadias, 2001].…”
Section: Argumentation-based Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing a focus on communication has been shown to deter the tendency to find a quick solution. 8 In this study, consensus was apparent when participants appealed to a larger group understanding (either something they had decided earlier in their group discussions or something the majority of participants in the class were doing) to validate and make design decisions. For example, in the two examples below we see participants in the large group appealing to a previously stated consensus and asking the group to reach consensus.…”
Section: Consensus-building Through Argumentationmentioning
confidence: 88%