“…The C 2 H 2 adsorption in PPX is 2.80 mmol g −1 , although the adsorption is not very good but performs better than UPC-98, 50 UMCM-151, 51 PFC-5, 52 FIR-125, 53 NUM-9a, 54 JLU-Liu45, 55 Zr-OBBA, 55 PFC-1/-2, 56 NUM-7, 57 Cu–F-pymo, 58 MOF 1/MOF 2, 59 UPC-99, 60 NbU-1. 61 C 2 H 4 adsorption was also impressive with 4.26 mmol g −1 and only MFM-300(In) 62 (4.9 mmol g −1 ), and Dps-VCo-BDC (7.41 mmol g −1 )/tpt-VCo-BDC(6.29 mmol g −1 ) 63 MOF is higher than PPX limit. Similarly, the adsorption of C 2 H 6 in PPX is quite higher with 4.22 mmol g −1 which is better than many of the notable MOFs and only Mg-MOF74(6.1 mmol g −1 ) 47 and its functionalized MOF tpt-Mg-MOF-74 (5.4 mmol g −1 ), MFM-300(In) (5.1 mmol g −1 ), 62 Gly@HKUST-1s (6.47 mmol g −1 ), 64 Dps-VCo-BDC (8.03 mmol g −1 )/tpt-VCo-BDC (6.69 mmol g −1 ), 63 and NPU-1 (4.50 mmol g −1 )/NPU-2(4.44 mmol g −1 ) 65 are higher than the PPX.…”