1999
DOI: 10.1109/8.761063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spectral Lanczos decomposition method for solving 3-D low-frequency electromagnetic diffusion by the finite-element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the edge basis functions satisfy a constant tangential component along the associated edge and no tangential components along the other edges, the expansion in guarantees the continuity of the tangential electric field, conserving the continuity of a current, which allows the discontinuity of normal electric fields, at an inter–element boundary. The edge finite‐element method satisfying the boundary condition can therefore effectively suppress the spurious solutions (Lynch and Paulsen 1991; Mur 1994b; Mur and Lager 2002), while conventional node‐based finite‐element methods not satisfying the condition achieve the same objective by introducing a penalty factor in the finite‐element formulation (Zunoubi et al . 1999).…”
Section: Edge Finite‐element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the edge basis functions satisfy a constant tangential component along the associated edge and no tangential components along the other edges, the expansion in guarantees the continuity of the tangential electric field, conserving the continuity of a current, which allows the discontinuity of normal electric fields, at an inter–element boundary. The edge finite‐element method satisfying the boundary condition can therefore effectively suppress the spurious solutions (Lynch and Paulsen 1991; Mur 1994b; Mur and Lager 2002), while conventional node‐based finite‐element methods not satisfying the condition achieve the same objective by introducing a penalty factor in the finite‐element formulation (Zunoubi et al . 1999).…”
Section: Edge Finite‐element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mackie, Smith and Madden 1994; Sasaki 1999; Newman and Alumbaugh 2002) and the finite‐element method (e.g. Sugeng, Raiche and Xiong 1999; Zunoubi et al . 1999; Badea et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This apparent attraction is counterbalanced by a nontrivial and usually time-consuming construction of the finite elements themselves. The FE approach has been implemented by many developers (Reddy et al, 1977;Pridmore et al, 1981;Paulsen et al, 1988;Boyce et al, 1992;Livelybrooks, 1993;Lager and Mur, 1998;Sugeng et al, 1999;Zunoubi et al, 1999;Ratz, 1999;Ellis, 1999;Haber, 1999;Zyserman and Santos, 2000;Badea et al, 2001;Mitsuhata and Uchida, 2004, among others).…”
Section: Finite-element Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3‐D modelling in geo‐electromagnetics has been carried out for several decades (see, e.g. the review papers by Avdeev 2005; Börner 2010), starting predominantly with the integral equation method (Raiche 1974; Hohmann 1975; Weidelt 1975; Wannamaker et al 1984; Newman et al 1986; Wannamaker 1991; Xiong & Tripp 1997; Avdeev et al 1997), followed by the finite difference method (Mackie et al 1993; Newman & Alumbaugh 1995; Smith 1996; Streich 2009), and recently by the finite element method (Mogi 1996; Zunoubi et al 1999; Zyserman & Santos 2000; Badea et al 2001; Mitsuhata & Uchida 2004; Nam et al 2007) and the finite volume method (Haber et al 2000; Haber & Ascher 2001; Weiss & Constable 2006; Haber & Heldmann 2007). Amongst the different numerical methods the finite element method provides the greatest flexibility regarding model geometry, the option for a higher order spatial approximation and a rigorous framework for the treatment of virtually arbitrary constitutive parameter distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%