2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2011.05127.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional adaptive higher order finite element simulation for geo-electromagnetics-a marine CSEM example

Abstract: S U M M A R YWe present a new 3-D vector finite element code and demonstrate its strength by modelling a realistic marine CSEM scenario. Unstructured tetrahedral meshes easily allow for the inclusion of arbitrary seafloor bathymetry so that natural environments are mapped into the model in a close-to-reality way. A primary/secondary field approach, an adaptive mesh refinement strategy as well as a higher order polynomial finite element approximation improve the solution accuracy. A convergence study strongly i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that for smooth solutions, p-refinement is advantageous and that combining it with h-refinement (the socalled h-p FEM) can lead to exponential convergence rates (Guo and Babuska, 1986;Bürg, 2013). Although h-refinement has been applied in geoelectromagnetic applications (Schwarzbach et al, 2011;Ren et al, 2013), little work has been performed to investigate advantages of higher polynomial degrees for 3D geoelectromagnetic modeling. Most existing FEM modeling codes in this area use the lowest order Nédélec finite elements, often called edge-based finite elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well known that for smooth solutions, p-refinement is advantageous and that combining it with h-refinement (the socalled h-p FEM) can lead to exponential convergence rates (Guo and Babuska, 1986;Bürg, 2013). Although h-refinement has been applied in geoelectromagnetic applications (Schwarzbach et al, 2011;Ren et al, 2013), little work has been performed to investigate advantages of higher polynomial degrees for 3D geoelectromagnetic modeling. Most existing FEM modeling codes in this area use the lowest order Nédélec finite elements, often called edge-based finite elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research in recent years has gone into developing FEM codes for geoelectromagnetic modeling (Börner, 2010;Farquharson and Miensopust, 2011;Schwarzbach et al, 2011;Ren et al, 2013;Um et al, 2013;Grayver and Bürg, 2014). They all make use of the so-called Nédélec finite elements, which permit a well-posed representation of EM fields taking into account discontinuities of the normal components (Jin, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work extends our previous work on time domain electromagnetics inversion using a single regular mesh to OcTree meshes. The underlying regular structure of OcTree meshes greatly simplifies mesh handling and algorithmic development, compared to the finite element method on unstructured tetrahedral meshes (Günther, Rücker and Spitzer, 2006;Schwarzbach et al, 2011). A similar approach has been published by Cox and Zhdanov (2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Direct matrix solvers for large geophysical 3D forward problems [33,28,30,26,24,14,19,8,35,2,15] can be computationally expensive, both in terms of memory and CPU time. A way to overcome this limitation is by reducing the dimensionality of the problem, namely from 3D modeling to a 2.5D [23], 2D [4] and/or 1D [20] approximations that are only suitable for particular geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%