2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ab1db5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatially resolved in situ calibration applied to infrared thermography

Abstract: When using thermography at elevated ambient temperature levels to determine the surface temperature of test specimen, radiation reflected on the test surfaces can lead to a large measurement error. Calibration methods accounting for this amount of radiation are available in the open literature. Those methods, however, only account for a scalar calibration parameter. With new, complex test rigs and inhomogeneous reflected radiation distribution, the need for a spatially resolved calibration arises. Therefore, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Martiny et al [15] present an in-situ calibration for infrared thermography with thermocouples embedded in the surface of interest; a setup later improved for highly curved surfaces by Aberle et al [16]. Considering non-uniform background radiation reflected by the surface, Elfner et al [17] developed a spatially resolved calibration based on ray-tracing algorithms.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martiny et al [15] present an in-situ calibration for infrared thermography with thermocouples embedded in the surface of interest; a setup later improved for highly curved surfaces by Aberle et al [16]. Considering non-uniform background radiation reflected by the surface, Elfner et al [17] developed a spatially resolved calibration based on ray-tracing algorithms.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Colbert 2006). Use of thermocouples (Martiny et al 1996) or ray-tracing methods (Elfner et al 2019) has aided this endeavor. However, additional theoretical and experimental data are necessary to develop accurate numerical simulations to measure the difference in temperature between a surface target and ground surface (Schachne et al 1998).…”
Section: Surface Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes a temperature uncertainty of ±0.3 K. Performing an in situ calibration would drastically reduce the uncertainty and at the same time account for variations in transmissivity and emissivity. Elfner et al managed to reduce the uncertainty by a factor of four through their in situ calibration [24]. Surface RTDs were installed on the two cooled blades, with the hope of providing an in situ measurement source, but it was not possible to place them in a location with an acceptable view angle for accurate calibration.…”
Section: Uncertainty Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%