2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Smart Mobile Assessment Tool for Collecting Data in Large-Scale Educational Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With technology, teachers can easily collect and analyse assessment results. The findings of this study are relevant to previous findings which say that the use of mobile technology in learning assessment will improve the quality of the assessment carried out by teachers (Andrews et al, 2018;Dearnley et al, 2009;Hwang & Chang, 2011). Furthermore, mobile technology is recommended in the current learning activities ( Park, 2011;Park et al, 2012).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…With technology, teachers can easily collect and analyse assessment results. The findings of this study are relevant to previous findings which say that the use of mobile technology in learning assessment will improve the quality of the assessment carried out by teachers (Andrews et al, 2018;Dearnley et al, 2009;Hwang & Chang, 2011). Furthermore, mobile technology is recommended in the current learning activities ( Park, 2011;Park et al, 2012).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…The assessment in both samples was conducted on Android A6 Tablets with 10.1-inch screen size. All test items were programmed specifically for the assessment tool ( Andrews et al, 2018 ). The process models were created in BPMN 2.0 ( OMG, 2011 OMG Specification, Object Management Group.).…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, five ranking tasks were presented on Android tablets with 10.1 inch screen size ( Andrews et al, 2018 ). Subjects ranked five images, resulting in a total of paired comparisons for each set of images (with a total of 5!…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%