2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2494.2002.00331.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation model of a dairy forage system to evaluate feeding management strategies with spring rotational grazing

Abstract: To counteract a decrease in the availability of grazing for feeding dairy cows in France, a simulation model is proposed in the paper, which combines decision and agronomic submodels to study forage system management strategies compatible with spring grazing use. Nine strategies were tested with the model using a sequence of 16 climatic years. Three of these strategies come from a survey in south‐west France and six others were designed with research scientists or farm advisors. The strategies differ in the du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, reflecting on what influences stocking density from the livestock system perspective is a complex question which cannot be tackled without taking interdependencies among several components of the forage system (pasture, maize and grass silage) into account. Empirical studies in France have emphasised that area allocation (for maize, grass silage, grazed and mowed pastures) and turnout date need to be combined in order to avoid over or under-production of grazing as well as silage surpluses at the annual scale (Coléno and Duru 1999;Coléno et al 2002). Using a simulation model, these authors showed that a turnout date based on the available herbage per hectare can be used to calculate grass area allocation for spring grazing in Fig.…”
Section: Livestock System Constraints At Relevant Spatial Scales and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reflecting on what influences stocking density from the livestock system perspective is a complex question which cannot be tackled without taking interdependencies among several components of the forage system (pasture, maize and grass silage) into account. Empirical studies in France have emphasised that area allocation (for maize, grass silage, grazed and mowed pastures) and turnout date need to be combined in order to avoid over or under-production of grazing as well as silage surpluses at the annual scale (Coléno and Duru 1999;Coléno et al 2002). Using a simulation model, these authors showed that a turnout date based on the available herbage per hectare can be used to calculate grass area allocation for spring grazing in Fig.…”
Section: Livestock System Constraints At Relevant Spatial Scales and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La coordination entre ateliers s'opère donc surtout à l'automne et au printemps. L'adaptation aux aléas est basée sur la variation ex ante des surfaces allouées (surface de provision, Coléno et al, 2002) et ex post de l'utilisation des ressources alimentaires (report de stock de fourrages conservés).…”
Section: Systèmes Fourragers Basés Sur Des Parcelles Homogènes Sans unclassified
“…Providing models and producing strictly biotechnical references does not suffice to deal with the problems posed in types of organisation that differ and to support decisions that are relevant. A similar modelling effort is needed to understand these organisations which form the framework in which decisions are made and actions carried out [15,17]. They therefore require differentiated advice and interventions from researchers and agricultural advisors, leading to a new generation of DSS, less prescriptive and more interactive.…”
Section: Consequences Of Decision Support With or Without Formal Dssmentioning
confidence: 99%