2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1563298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple quantum mechanical treatment of scattering in nanoscale transistors

Abstract: We present a computationally efficient, two-dimensional quantum mechanical simulation scheme for modeling dissipative electron transport in thin body, fully depleted, n-channel, silicon-on-insulator transistors. The simulation scheme, which solves the nonequilibrium Green's function equations self consistently with Poisson's equation, treats the effect of scattering using a simple approximation inspired by the ''Büttiker probes,'' often used in mesoscopic physics. It is based on an expansion of the active devi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
128
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
128
2
Order By: Relevance
“…13,16 Surface and interface roughness are included with the real-space treatment, 17 inelastic scattering processes are emulated with an analog of relaxation time approximation or "Buttiker probes." 18 We note, however, that in this study the emulation of inelastic scattering only affected the on-current values (about 10% reduction compared with the case of elastic scattering only) and practically did not affect the capacitance and the switching energy values. The CBR3D simulator shows a linear scaling with the number of grid points (i.e., problem size) and a nearly linear speed-up with the number of CPUs as shown in Fig.…”
contrasting
confidence: 62%
“…13,16 Surface and interface roughness are included with the real-space treatment, 17 inelastic scattering processes are emulated with an analog of relaxation time approximation or "Buttiker probes." 18 We note, however, that in this study the emulation of inelastic scattering only affected the on-current values (about 10% reduction compared with the case of elastic scattering only) and practically did not affect the capacitance and the switching energy values. The CBR3D simulator shows a linear scaling with the number of grid points (i.e., problem size) and a nearly linear speed-up with the number of CPUs as shown in Fig.…”
contrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In many nanoscale semiconductor devices like ultrashort channel doublegate MOSFETs, electrons might be extremely confined in one direction transverse to the transport directions. The mode-space approach, also referred to as subband decomposition method [30,31,9,10,32], was recently introduced by several authors in order to take advantage of this reduction of dimensionality and design efficient numerical codes. This method consists of a "block diagonalisation" of the electron Hamiltonian thanks to a separation of the confinement and transport directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current magnitude decreases compared to the ballistic case because scattered electrons lose momentum as a result of scattering. 13,17 To get a better understanding of the contributions of tunneling and diffusion to the current spectrum, we have plotted the LDOS of the channel region. Figure 5͑a͒ clearly shows that there is some available DOS under the barrier in the case of ballistic transport, which causes tunneling current, the dominant transport mechanism in subthreshold operation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can observe that the LDOS for ballistic transport exhibits strong oscillations which are due to quantum interference whereas in the case of AP scattering LDOS has been broaden to adjacent energy levels because scattering inside the nanowire randomizes the phase of the electrons and hence destroys the quantum coherence in the device. 12,17,22 In Fig. 6 we have plotted the energy-resolved electron density for L g = 30 nm and V DS = 0.4 V. In the presence of elastic AP scattering, the carriers will change direction in the channel without losing energy which leads to increase in carrier back scattering and charge reduction in channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation