1995
DOI: 10.18474/0749-8004-30.1.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Method to Quantify Dot Blots For Predator Gut Content Analyses1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore a positive immunoreaction (purple) on a dot blot yields a value lower than that of a negative immunoreaction (white). Predators were scored positive for pink bollworm egg remains if the hue was three standard deviations below that of the mean negative predator control reading (Hagler et al, 1995). Western blots were visually scored as positive if at least one band was visible on the nitrocellulose membrane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore a positive immunoreaction (purple) on a dot blot yields a value lower than that of a negative immunoreaction (white). Predators were scored positive for pink bollworm egg remains if the hue was three standard deviations below that of the mean negative predator control reading (Hagler et al, 1995). Western blots were visually scored as positive if at least one band was visible on the nitrocellulose membrane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ELISA has many subtle variations (e.g., direct, indirect, and sandwich ELISA), each of which offers distinct advantages and disadvantages under certain circumstances. Currently, the indirect ELISA and dot blot when used with specific antipest monoclonal antibodies (MAb) are the most common immunoassays used for examining predator gut content (Stuart and Greenstone, 1990;Hagler et al, 1991Hagler et al, , 1992Hagler et al, , 1995Hagler and Naranjo, 1994a,b;Greenstone and Hunt, 1993;Symondson and Liddell, 1993a,b). While each of the immunoassay formats described above has distinct advantages and disadvantages for examining predator gut content, to date, no experimental data exist that directly compares the efficacy of all these various immunoassays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dot blots, although similar to indirect ELISAs, are more sensitive due to a greater number of competitive binding sites on a nitrocellulose membrane than on an ELISA microplate matrix. However, the major drawback with using a dot blot assay is that the immunoreaction is difficult to measure (Hagler et al, 1995). Finally, a sandwich ELISA can be substituted for the indirect ELISA.…”
Section: G Punctipesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1996; Sleaford et al . 1996; Triltsch 1997), the development of prey‐specific protein antibodies (Greenstone & Hunt 1993; Hagler et al . 1995; Powell et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%